Demographics details for Mukilteo, WA vs Binford, ND
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mukilteo, WA vs Binford, ND.
Data | Mukilteo | Binford |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,096 | 163 |
Median Age | 43.6 years | 42.5 years |
Median Income | $123,036 | $46,250 |
Married Families | 48.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Mukilteo vs Binford
- In Mukilteo, the population is higher at 21,096, compared to 163 in Binford.
- Residents in Mukilteo have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 42.5 years in Binford.
- Mukilteo has a higher median income of $123,036 compared to $46,250 in Binford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mukilteo at 48.0% compared to 33.0% in Binford.
- The poverty level is higher in Binford at 10%, compared to 5% in Mukilteo.
- The unemployment rate in Mukilteo is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.5% in Binford.
Demographics
Demographics Mukilteo vs Binford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mukilteo | Binford |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 61 | 94 |
Asian | 21 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 6 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 11 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mukilteo vs Binford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mukilteo at 1% compared to 0% in Binford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Binford at 94% compared to 61% in Mukilteo.
- The Asian population is larger in Mukilteo at 21% compared to 0% in Binford.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Mukilteo and Binford at 6%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mukilteo at 11% compared to 0% in Binford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mukilteo and Binford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mukilteo | Binford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 14.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 9.8% |
Depression | 26.5% | 20.1% |
Smoking | 9.3% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 21.9% |
Obesity | 29.2% | 40.0% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mukilteo vs Binford
- More residents in Mukilteo report poor mental health at 14.6% compared to 14.3% in Binford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mukilteo at 26.5% compared to 20.1% in Binford.
- Binford has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 9.3% in Mukilteo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Binford at 21.9% compared to 15.7% in Mukilteo.
- Binford has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 29.2% in Mukilteo.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Mukilteo and Binford at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mukilteo | Binford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (24) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 9.7% (2,042) | 23.9% (39) |
Less than High School | 2.0% (414) | 11.0% (18) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.3% (8,089) | 17.2% (28) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mukilteo vs Binford
- A higher percentage of residents in Mukilteo have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Binford.
- In Binford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.9% compared to 9.7% in Mukilteo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Binford at 11.0%, compared to 2.0% in Mukilteo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mukilteo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.3% compared to 17.2% in Binford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.