Demographics details for Mountain view, CA vs Shrub oak, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mountain view, CA vs Shrub oak, NY.
Data | Mountain view | Shrub oak |
---|---|---|
Population | 81,059 | 3,002 |
Median Age | 35.5 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $174,156 | $128,832 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mountain view vs Shrub oak
- In Mountain view, the population is higher at 81,059, compared to 3,002 in Shrub oak.
- The median age in Shrub oak is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 35.5 years in Mountain view.
- Mountain view has a higher median income of $174,156 compared to $128,832 in Shrub oak.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mountain view at 43.0% compared to 38.0% in Shrub oak.
- Mountain view has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Shrub oak.
- Shrub oak has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Mountain view.
Demographics
Demographics Mountain view vs Shrub oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mountain view | Shrub oak |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 2 |
White | 32 | 64 |
Asian | 34 | 15 |
Hispanic | 19 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 1 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mountain view vs Shrub oak
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Mountain view and Shrub oak at 2%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shrub oak at 64% compared to 32% in Mountain view.
- The Asian population is larger in Mountain view at 34% compared to 15% in Shrub oak.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mountain view at 19% compared to 18% in Shrub oak.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mountain view at 12% compared to 1% in Shrub oak.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Mountain view at 1% compared to 0% in Shrub oak.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mountain view | Shrub oak |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 11.7% | 13.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 8.2% |
Depression | 14.7% | 19.7% |
Smoking | 6.5% | 11.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 18.1% |
Obesity | 19.1% | 25.7% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mountain view vs Shrub oak
- In Shrub oak, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.2% compared to 11.7% in Mountain view.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shrub oak at 19.7% versus 14.7% in Mountain view.
- Shrub oak has a higher smoking rate at 11.3% compared to 6.5% in Mountain view.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Shrub oak at 18.1% compared to 14.9% in Mountain view.
- Shrub oak has higher obesity rates at 25.7% compared to 19.1% in Mountain view.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shrub oak at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Mountain view.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mountain view | Shrub oak |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (826) | 0.4% (13) |
High School Diploma | 4.9% (3,963) | 11.0% (330) |
Less than High School | 7.1% (5,739) | 12.9% (387) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 54.5% (44,174) | 38.9% (1,168) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mountain view vs Shrub oak
- A higher percentage of residents in Mountain view have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Shrub oak.
- In Shrub oak, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.0% compared to 4.9% in Mountain view.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shrub oak at 12.9%, compared to 7.1% in Mountain view.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mountain view hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.5% compared to 38.9% in Shrub oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.