Demographics details for Mountain view, CA vs Navajo dam, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mountain view, CA vs Navajo dam, NM.
Data | Mountain view | Navajo dam |
---|---|---|
Population | 81,059 | 330 |
Median Age | 35.5 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $174,156 | $63,375 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mountain view vs Navajo dam
- In Mountain view, the population is higher at 81,059, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- The median age in Navajo dam is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 35.5 years in Mountain view.
- Mountain view has a higher median income of $174,156 compared to $63,375 in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mountain view at 43.0% compared to 34.0% in Navajo dam.
- The poverty level is higher in Navajo dam at 14%, compared to 6% in Mountain view.
- Navajo dam has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Mountain view.
Demographics
Demographics Mountain view vs Navajo dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mountain view | Navajo dam |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | Data is updating |
White | 32 | 16 |
Asian | 34 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 19 | 67 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Mountain view vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mountain view at 2% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- Mountain view has a higher percentage of White residents at 32% compared to 16% in Navajo dam.
- The Asian population is larger in Mountain view at 34% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 67%, compared to 19% in Mountain view.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mountain view at 12% compared to 11% in Navajo dam.
- In Navajo dam, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 1% in Mountain view.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mountain view | Navajo dam |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 11.7% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 11.2% |
Depression | 14.7% | 17.8% |
Smoking | 6.5% | 15.0% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 14.1% |
Obesity | 19.1% | 32.6% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mountain view vs Navajo dam
- In Navajo dam, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 11.7% in Mountain view.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Navajo dam at 17.8% versus 14.7% in Mountain view.
- Navajo dam has a higher smoking rate at 15.0% compared to 6.5% in Mountain view.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mountain view at 14.9% compared to 14.1% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has higher obesity rates at 32.6% compared to 19.1% in Mountain view.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Navajo dam at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Mountain view.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mountain view | Navajo dam |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (826) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 4.9% (3,963) | 4.8% (16) |
Less than High School | 7.1% (5,739) | 6.1% (20) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 54.5% (44,174) | 22.7% (75) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mountain view vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of residents in Mountain view have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mountain view hold a high school diploma at 4.9% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- More residents in Mountain view have less than a high school education at 7.1% compared to 6.1% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mountain view hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.5% compared to 22.7% in Navajo dam.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.