Demographics details for Mountain view, AR vs Greensboro, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mountain view, AR vs Greensboro, NC.

Data Mountain view Greensboro
Population 2,915 301,115
Median Age 55.5 years 34.0 years
Median Income $23,458 $55,051
Married Families 25.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 17% 14%
Unemployment Rate 4.8 5.0

Population Comparison: Mountain view vs Greensboro

  • The population in Greensboro is higher at 301,115, compared to 2,915 in Mountain view.
  • Residents in Mountain view have a higher median age of 55.5 years compared to 34.0 years in Greensboro.
  • Greensboro has a higher median income of $55,051, compared to $23,458 in Mountain view.
  • In Greensboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 29.0%, compared to 25.0% in Mountain view.
  • Mountain view has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 14% in Greensboro.
  • Greensboro has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.8% in Mountain view.

Demographics

Demographics Mountain view vs Greensboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mountain view Greensboro
Black 1 42
White 89 38
Asian 1 5
Hispanic 8 9
Two or More Races 1 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mountain view vs Greensboro

  • In Greensboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 1% in Mountain view.
  • Mountain view has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 38% in Greensboro.
  • In Greensboro, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Mountain view.
  • Greensboro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 8% in Mountain view.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Greensboro at 6%, compared to 1% in Mountain view.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mountain view and Greensboro at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mountain view Greensboro
Mental Health Not Good 22.6% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good 16.7% 11.4%
Depression 31.9% 22.2%
Smoking 26.6% 15.6%
Binge Drinking 14.9% 15.5%
Obesity 41.1% 36.5%
Disability Percentage 36.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mountain view vs Greensboro

  • More residents in Mountain view report poor mental health at 22.6% compared to 15.8% in Greensboro.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mountain view at 31.9% compared to 22.2% in Greensboro.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mountain view at 26.6% compared to 15.6% in Greensboro.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Greensboro at 15.5% compared to 14.9% in Mountain view.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mountain view at 41.1% compared to 36.5% in Greensboro.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mountain view at 36.0% compared to 11.0% in Greensboro.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mountain view Greensboro
No Schooling 2.4% (70) 1.2% (3,655)
High School Diploma 17.8% (520) 11.5% (34,595)
Less than High School 15.9% (464) 8.9% (26,682)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.3% (329) 25.2% (75,909)

Education Levels Comparison: Mountain view vs Greensboro

  • A higher percentage of residents in Mountain view have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.2% in Greensboro.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mountain view hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 11.5% in Greensboro.
  • More residents in Mountain view have less than a high school education at 15.9% compared to 8.9% in Greensboro.
  • In Greensboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.2% compared to 11.3% in Mountain view.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.