Demographics details for Mountain pine, AR vs Tacoma, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mountain pine, AR vs Tacoma, WA.
| Data | Mountain pine | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 577 | 221,776 |
| Median Age | 44.2 years | 36.9 years |
| Median Income | $28,542 | $79,085 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Mountain pine vs Tacoma
- The population in Tacoma is higher at 221,776, compared to 577 in Mountain pine.
- Residents in Mountain pine have a higher median age of 44.2 years compared to 36.9 years in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher median income of $79,085, compared to $28,542 in Mountain pine.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 28.0% in Mountain pine.
- Mountain pine has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.5% in Mountain pine.
Demographics
Demographics Mountain pine vs Tacoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mountain pine | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 11 |
| White | 85 | 53 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Mountain pine vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 8% in Mountain pine.
- Mountain pine has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- In Tacoma, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Mountain pine.
- Tacoma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 2% in Mountain pine.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tacoma at 13%, compared to 5% in Mountain pine.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Mountain pine.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mountain pine | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 26.8% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mountain pine vs Tacoma
- More residents in Mountain pine report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 18.9% in Tacoma.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mountain pine at 26.8% compared to 26.2% in Tacoma.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mountain pine at 24.8% compared to 15.4% in Tacoma.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tacoma at 16.2% compared to 14.8% in Mountain pine.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mountain pine at 39.5% compared to 34.6% in Tacoma.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mountain pine at 23.0% compared to 14.0% in Tacoma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mountain pine | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.6% (3,474) |
| High School Diploma | 30.8% (178) | 14.2% (31,504) |
| Less than High School | 9.4% (54) | 10.1% (22,501) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.9% (17) | 23.0% (50,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mountain pine vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Mountain pine.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mountain pine hold a high school diploma at 30.8% compared to 14.2% in Tacoma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tacoma at 10.1%, compared to 9.4% in Mountain pine.
- In Tacoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 2.9% in Mountain pine.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.