Demographics details for Mountain pine, AR vs Richardson, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mountain pine, AR vs Richardson, TX.

Data Mountain pine Richardson
Population 577 118,802
Median Age 44.2 years 34.5 years
Median Income $28,542 $94,362
Married Families 28.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 20% 6%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.9

Population Comparison: Mountain pine vs Richardson

  • The population in Richardson is higher at 118,802, compared to 577 in Mountain pine.
  • Residents in Mountain pine have a higher median age of 44.2 years compared to 34.5 years in Richardson.
  • Richardson has a higher median income of $94,362, compared to $28,542 in Mountain pine.
  • In Richardson, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 28.0% in Mountain pine.
  • Mountain pine has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 6% in Richardson.
  • The unemployment rate in Mountain pine is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.9% in Richardson.

Demographics

Demographics Mountain pine vs Richardson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mountain pine Richardson
Black 8 12
White 85 49
Asian Data is updating 15
Hispanic 2 17
Two or More Races 5 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mountain pine vs Richardson

  • In Richardson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 8% in Mountain pine.
  • Mountain pine has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 49% in Richardson.
  • In Richardson, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 0% in Mountain pine.
  • Richardson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 2% in Mountain pine.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richardson at 7%, compared to 5% in Mountain pine.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mountain pine and Richardson at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mountain pine Richardson
Mental Health Not Good 20.8% 14.4%
Physical Health Not Good 14.8% 8.9%
Depression 26.8% 20.9%
Smoking 24.8% 11.8%
Binge Drinking 14.8% 18.3%
Obesity 39.5% 28.2%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mountain pine vs Richardson

  • More residents in Mountain pine report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 14.4% in Richardson.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mountain pine at 26.8% compared to 20.9% in Richardson.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mountain pine at 24.8% compared to 11.8% in Richardson.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Richardson at 18.3% compared to 14.8% in Mountain pine.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mountain pine at 39.5% compared to 28.2% in Richardson.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mountain pine at 23.0% compared to 9.0% in Richardson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mountain pine Richardson
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.4% (1,646)
High School Diploma 30.8% (178) 6.8% (8,041)
Less than High School 9.4% (54) 8.4% (10,002)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 2.9% (17) 36.7% (43,584)

Education Levels Comparison: Mountain pine vs Richardson

  • In Richardson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Mountain pine.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mountain pine hold a high school diploma at 30.8% compared to 6.8% in Richardson.
  • More residents in Mountain pine have less than a high school education at 9.4% compared to 8.4% in Richardson.
  • In Richardson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.7% compared to 2.9% in Mountain pine.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.