Demographics details for Mountain home, ID vs Pittsford, VT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mountain home, ID vs Pittsford, VT.
| Data | Mountain home | Pittsford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,469 | 2,807 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $53,108 | $65,000 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 1.7 |
Population Comparison: Mountain home vs Pittsford
- In Mountain home, the population is higher at 16,469, compared to 2,807 in Pittsford.
- The median age in Pittsford is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 31.3 years in Mountain home.
- Pittsford has a higher median income of $65,000, compared to $53,108 in Mountain home.
- In Pittsford, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 36.0% in Mountain home.
- Mountain home has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Pittsford.
- The unemployment rate in Mountain home is higher at 3.1%, compared to 1.7% in Pittsford.
Demographics
Demographics Mountain home vs Pittsford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mountain home | Pittsford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 69 | 97 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 1 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mountain home vs Pittsford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mountain home at 2% compared to 0% in Pittsford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pittsford at 97% compared to 69% in Mountain home.
- The Asian population is larger in Mountain home at 4% compared to 1% in Pittsford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mountain home at 14% compared to 1% in Pittsford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mountain home at 9% compared to 1% in Pittsford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Mountain home at 2% compared to 0% in Pittsford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mountain home | Pittsford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 22.4% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mountain home vs Pittsford
- More residents in Mountain home report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mountain home at 22.4% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mountain home at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mountain home at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mountain home at 36.1% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mountain home at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mountain home | Pittsford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (273) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (2,690) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (2,116) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (1,720) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mountain home vs Pittsford
- A higher percentage of residents in Mountain home have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mountain home hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- More residents in Mountain home have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mountain home hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.4% compared to 0.0% in Pittsford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.