Demographics details for Mountain home, AR vs Randleman, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mountain home, AR vs Randleman, NC.

Data Mountain home Randleman
Population 13,150 4,642
Median Age 41.8 years 33.5 years
Median Income $42,281 $63,040
Married Families 38.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 14% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Mountain home vs Randleman

  • In Mountain home, the population is higher at 13,150, compared to 4,642 in Randleman.
  • Residents in Mountain home have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 33.5 years in Randleman.
  • Randleman has a higher median income of $63,040, compared to $42,281 in Mountain home.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Mountain home and Randleman at 38.0%.
  • Mountain home has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Randleman.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Mountain home and Randleman at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Mountain home vs Randleman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mountain home Randleman
Black Data is updating 4
White 90 77
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 4 9
Two or More Races 4 8
American Indian 1 2

Demographics Comparison: Mountain home vs Randleman

  • In Randleman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Mountain home.
  • Mountain home has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 77% in Randleman.
  • The Asian population is larger in Mountain home at 1% compared to 0% in Randleman.
  • Randleman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 4% in Mountain home.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Randleman at 8%, compared to 4% in Mountain home.
  • In Randleman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Mountain home.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mountain home Randleman
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 12.9% 12.0%
Depression 28.5% 25.7%
Smoking 21.1% 19.4%
Binge Drinking 16.3% 17.7%
Obesity 34.3% 37.5%
Disability Percentage 22.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mountain home vs Randleman

  • More residents in Mountain home report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.6% in Randleman.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mountain home at 28.5% compared to 25.7% in Randleman.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mountain home at 21.1% compared to 19.4% in Randleman.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Randleman at 17.7% compared to 16.3% in Mountain home.
  • Randleman has higher obesity rates at 37.5% compared to 34.3% in Mountain home.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mountain home at 22.0% compared to 21.0% in Randleman.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mountain home Randleman
No Schooling 0.7% (87) 0.3% (16)
High School Diploma 16.9% (2,225) 16.5% (768)
Less than High School 14.2% (1,870) 22.1% (1,026)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.0% (1,973) 6.9% (320)

Education Levels Comparison: Mountain home vs Randleman

  • A higher percentage of residents in Mountain home have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Randleman.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mountain home hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 16.5% in Randleman.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Randleman at 22.1%, compared to 14.2% in Mountain home.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mountain home hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 6.9% in Randleman.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.