Demographics details for Mountain home, AR vs Lutz, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mountain home, AR vs Lutz, FL.

Data Mountain home Lutz
Population 13,150 24,721
Median Age 41.8 years 41.0 years
Median Income $42,281 $101,159
Married Families 38.0% 49.0%
Poverty Level 14% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Mountain home vs Lutz

  • The population in Lutz is higher at 24,721, compared to 13,150 in Mountain home.
  • Residents in Mountain home have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 41.0 years in Lutz.
  • Lutz has a higher median income of $101,159, compared to $42,281 in Mountain home.
  • In Lutz, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 38.0% in Mountain home.
  • Mountain home has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Lutz.
  • The unemployment rate in Mountain home is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Lutz.

Demographics

Demographics Mountain home vs Lutz provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mountain home Lutz
Black Data is updating 6
White 90 58
Asian 1 6
Hispanic 4 18
Two or More Races 4 12
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mountain home vs Lutz

  • In Lutz, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Mountain home.
  • Mountain home has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 58% in Lutz.
  • In Lutz, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Mountain home.
  • Lutz has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 4% in Mountain home.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lutz at 12%, compared to 4% in Mountain home.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Mountain home at 1% compared to 0% in Lutz.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mountain home Lutz
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 14.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.9% 8.7%
Depression 28.5% 17.7%
Smoking 21.1% 14.2%
Binge Drinking 16.3% 18.5%
Obesity 34.3% 26.0%
Disability Percentage 22.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mountain home vs Lutz

  • More residents in Mountain home report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.4% in Lutz.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mountain home at 28.5% compared to 17.7% in Lutz.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mountain home at 21.1% compared to 14.2% in Lutz.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Lutz at 18.5% compared to 16.3% in Mountain home.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mountain home at 34.3% compared to 26.0% in Lutz.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mountain home at 22.0% compared to 10.0% in Lutz.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mountain home Lutz
No Schooling 0.7% (87) 0.5% (114)
High School Diploma 16.9% (2,225) 10.6% (2,621)
Less than High School 14.2% (1,870) 3.1% (774)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.0% (1,973) 33.7% (8,336)

Education Levels Comparison: Mountain home vs Lutz

  • A higher percentage of residents in Mountain home have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Lutz.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mountain home hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 10.6% in Lutz.
  • More residents in Mountain home have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 3.1% in Lutz.
  • In Lutz, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.7% compared to 15.0% in Mountain home.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.