Demographics details for Mountain home, AR vs Hickory, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mountain home, AR vs Hickory, NC.
Data | Mountain home | Hickory |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,150 | 44,084 |
Median Age | 41.8 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $42,281 | $58,251 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Mountain home vs Hickory
- The population in Hickory is higher at 44,084, compared to 13,150 in Mountain home.
- Residents in Mountain home have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 37.9 years in Hickory.
- Hickory has a higher median income of $58,251, compared to $42,281 in Mountain home.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mountain home at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Hickory.
- Mountain home has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Hickory.
- Hickory has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.5% in Mountain home.
Demographics
Demographics Mountain home vs Hickory provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mountain home | Hickory |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 13 |
White | 90 | 62 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 4 | 13 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mountain home vs Hickory
- In Hickory, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 0% in Mountain home.
- Mountain home has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 62% in Hickory.
- In Hickory, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Mountain home.
- Hickory has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 4% in Mountain home.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hickory at 7%, compared to 4% in Mountain home.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mountain home and Hickory at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mountain home | Hickory |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 12.3% |
Depression | 28.5% | 24.8% |
Smoking | 21.1% | 18.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 34.3% | 37.7% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mountain home vs Hickory
- More residents in Mountain home report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.1% in Hickory.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mountain home at 28.5% compared to 24.8% in Hickory.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mountain home at 21.1% compared to 18.1% in Hickory.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hickory at 17.2% compared to 16.3% in Mountain home.
- Hickory has higher obesity rates at 37.7% compared to 34.3% in Mountain home.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mountain home at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Hickory.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mountain home | Hickory |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (87) | 0.7% (306) |
High School Diploma | 16.9% (2,225) | 13.1% (5,797) |
Less than High School | 14.2% (1,870) | 11.4% (5,022) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (1,973) | 24.0% (10,580) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mountain home vs Hickory
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Mountain home and Hickory at 0.7%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mountain home hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 13.1% in Hickory.
- More residents in Mountain home have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 11.4% in Hickory.
- In Hickory, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.0% compared to 15.0% in Mountain home.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.