Demographics details for Mountain home, AR vs Cleburne, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mountain home, AR vs Cleburne, TX.
Data | Mountain home | Cleburne |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,150 | 33,826 |
Median Age | 41.8 years | 35.2 years |
Median Income | $42,281 | $60,929 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Mountain home vs Cleburne
- The population in Cleburne is higher at 33,826, compared to 13,150 in Mountain home.
- Residents in Mountain home have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 35.2 years in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher median income of $60,929, compared to $42,281 in Mountain home.
- In Cleburne, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 38.0% in Mountain home.
- Mountain home has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 11% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Mountain home.
Demographics
Demographics Mountain home vs Cleburne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mountain home | Cleburne |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 6 |
White | 90 | 52 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 29 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mountain home vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Mountain home.
- Mountain home has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
- Both Mountain home and Cleburne have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Cleburne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 4% in Mountain home.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 4% in Mountain home.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mountain home and Cleburne at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mountain home | Cleburne |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 13.3% |
Depression | 28.5% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 21.1% | 20.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 34.3% | 37.6% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mountain home vs Cleburne
- More residents in Mountain home report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.6% in Cleburne.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mountain home at 28.5% compared to 23.6% in Cleburne.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mountain home at 21.1% compared to 20.0% in Cleburne.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cleburne at 17.9% compared to 16.3% in Mountain home.
- Cleburne has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 34.3% in Mountain home.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mountain home at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Cleburne.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mountain home | Cleburne |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (87) | 1.4% (471) |
High School Diploma | 16.9% (2,225) | 17.8% (6,005) |
Less than High School | 14.2% (1,870) | 17.8% (6,010) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (1,973) | 10.0% (3,384) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mountain home vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Mountain home.
- In Cleburne, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 16.9% in Mountain home.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleburne at 17.8%, compared to 14.2% in Mountain home.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mountain home hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.