Demographics details for Mountain home, AR vs Burneyville, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mountain home, AR vs Burneyville, OK.

Data Mountain home Burneyville
Population 13,150 860
Median Age 41.8 years 45.3 years
Median Income $42,281 $68,015
Married Families 38.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 14% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.0

Population Comparison: Mountain home vs Burneyville

  • In Mountain home, the population is higher at 13,150, compared to 860 in Burneyville.
  • The median age in Burneyville is higher at 45.3 years, compared to 41.8 years in Mountain home.
  • Burneyville has a higher median income of $68,015, compared to $42,281 in Mountain home.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Mountain home at 38.0% compared to 33.0% in Burneyville.
  • Mountain home has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Burneyville.
  • The unemployment rate in Mountain home is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.0% in Burneyville.

Demographics

Demographics Mountain home vs Burneyville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mountain home Burneyville
Black Data is updating 5
White 90 65
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 4 12
Two or More Races 4 15
American Indian 1 3

Demographics Comparison: Mountain home vs Burneyville

  • In Burneyville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Mountain home.
  • Mountain home has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 65% in Burneyville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Mountain home at 1% compared to 0% in Burneyville.
  • Burneyville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 4% in Mountain home.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Burneyville at 15%, compared to 4% in Mountain home.
  • In Burneyville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Mountain home.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mountain home Burneyville
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 19.0%
Physical Health Not Good 12.9% 12.9%
Depression 28.5% 26.3%
Smoking 21.1% 21.1%
Binge Drinking 16.3% 15.0%
Obesity 34.3% 39.6%
Disability Percentage 22.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mountain home vs Burneyville

  • More residents in Mountain home report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 19.0% in Burneyville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mountain home at 28.5% compared to 26.3% in Burneyville.
  • Smoking rates are the same in both Mountain home and Burneyville at 21.1%.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mountain home at 16.3% compared to 15.0% in Burneyville.
  • Burneyville has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 34.3% in Mountain home.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Burneyville at 26.0% compared to 22.0% in Mountain home.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mountain home Burneyville
No Schooling 0.7% (87) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.9% (2,225) 22.8% (196)
Less than High School 14.2% (1,870) 7.4% (64)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.0% (1,973) 12.4% (107)

Education Levels Comparison: Mountain home vs Burneyville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Mountain home have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Burneyville.
  • In Burneyville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 16.9% in Mountain home.
  • More residents in Mountain home have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 7.4% in Burneyville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mountain home hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 12.4% in Burneyville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.