Demographics details for Mountain home, AR vs Angier, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mountain home, AR vs Angier, NC.
Data | Mountain home | Angier |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,150 | 6,099 |
Median Age | 41.8 years | 41.0 years |
Median Income | $42,281 | $54,936 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Mountain home vs Angier
- In Mountain home, the population is higher at 13,150, compared to 6,099 in Angier.
- Residents in Mountain home have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 41.0 years in Angier.
- Angier has a higher median income of $54,936, compared to $42,281 in Mountain home.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mountain home at 38.0% compared to 34.0% in Angier.
- Mountain home has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Angier.
- The unemployment rate in Mountain home is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in Angier.
Demographics
Demographics Mountain home vs Angier provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mountain home | Angier |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 11 |
White | 90 | 64 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mountain home vs Angier
- In Angier, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in Mountain home.
- Mountain home has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 64% in Angier.
- Both Mountain home and Angier have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Angier has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 4% in Mountain home.
- Both Mountain home and Angier have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mountain home and Angier at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mountain home | Angier |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 11.6% |
Depression | 28.5% | 24.2% |
Smoking | 21.1% | 16.6% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 15.7% |
Obesity | 34.3% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mountain home vs Angier
- More residents in Mountain home report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.3% in Angier.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mountain home at 28.5% compared to 24.2% in Angier.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mountain home at 21.1% compared to 16.6% in Angier.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mountain home at 16.3% compared to 15.7% in Angier.
- Angier has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 34.3% in Mountain home.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mountain home at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Angier.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mountain home | Angier |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (87) | 3.1% (190) |
High School Diploma | 16.9% (2,225) | 11.3% (688) |
Less than High School | 14.2% (1,870) | 21.3% (1,300) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (1,973) | 16.6% (1,013) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mountain home vs Angier
- In Angier, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.7% in Mountain home.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mountain home hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 11.3% in Angier.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Angier at 21.3%, compared to 14.2% in Mountain home.
- In Angier, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.6% compared to 15.0% in Mountain home.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.