Demographics details for Mountain grove, MO vs Rockingham, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mountain grove, MO vs Rockingham, NC.

Data Mountain grove Rockingham
Population 4,551 91,957
Median Age 42.3 years 45.1 years
Median Income $38,103 $50,737
Married Families 35.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 15% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Mountain grove vs Rockingham

  • The population in Rockingham is higher at 91,957, compared to 4,551 in Mountain grove.
  • The median age in Rockingham is higher at 45.1 years, compared to 42.3 years in Mountain grove.
  • Rockingham has a higher median income of $50,737, compared to $38,103 in Mountain grove.
  • In Rockingham, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 35.0% in Mountain grove.
  • Mountain grove has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Rockingham.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Mountain grove and Rockingham at 4.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Mountain grove vs Rockingham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mountain grove Rockingham
Black Data is updating 17
White 89 70
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 2 6
Two or More Races 8 5
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Mountain grove vs Rockingham

  • In Rockingham, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 0% in Mountain grove.
  • Mountain grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 70% in Rockingham.
  • Both Mountain grove and Rockingham have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Rockingham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Mountain grove.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Mountain grove at 8% compared to 5% in Rockingham.
  • In Rockingham, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mountain grove.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mountain grove Rockingham
Mental Health Not Good 22.5% 17.7%
Physical Health Not Good 18.1% 12.6%
Depression 28.4% 24.9%
Smoking 31.2% 20.0%
Binge Drinking 14.8% 16.8%
Obesity 44.6% 39.7%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mountain grove vs Rockingham

  • More residents in Mountain grove report poor mental health at 22.5% compared to 17.7% in Rockingham.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mountain grove at 28.4% compared to 24.9% in Rockingham.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mountain grove at 31.2% compared to 20.0% in Rockingham.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Rockingham at 16.8% compared to 14.8% in Mountain grove.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mountain grove at 44.6% compared to 39.7% in Rockingham.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mountain grove at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in Rockingham.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mountain grove Rockingham
No Schooling 0.6% (26) 0.8% (738)
High School Diploma 27.6% (1,256) 19.9% (18,325)
Less than High School 23.2% (1,057) 20.9% (19,256)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.8% (400) 11.1% (10,198)

Education Levels Comparison: Mountain grove vs Rockingham

  • In Rockingham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Mountain grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mountain grove hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 19.9% in Rockingham.
  • More residents in Mountain grove have less than a high school education at 23.2% compared to 20.9% in Rockingham.
  • In Rockingham, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 8.8% in Mountain grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.