Demographics details for Mountain grove, MO vs Chowchilla, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mountain grove, MO vs Chowchilla, CA.

Data Mountain grove Chowchilla
Population 4,551 18,738
Median Age 42.3 years 34.1 years
Median Income $38,103 $67,212
Married Families 35.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 15% 19%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.2

Population Comparison: Mountain grove vs Chowchilla

  • The population in Chowchilla is higher at 18,738, compared to 4,551 in Mountain grove.
  • Residents in Mountain grove have a higher median age of 42.3 years compared to 34.1 years in Chowchilla.
  • Chowchilla has a higher median income of $67,212, compared to $38,103 in Mountain grove.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Mountain grove at 35.0% compared to 26.0% in Chowchilla.
  • The poverty level is higher in Chowchilla at 19%, compared to 15% in Mountain grove.
  • Chowchilla has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Mountain grove.

Demographics

Demographics Mountain grove vs Chowchilla provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mountain grove Chowchilla
Black Data is updating 6
White 89 29
Asian 1 6
Hispanic 2 48
Two or More Races 8 9
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Mountain grove vs Chowchilla

  • In Chowchilla, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Mountain grove.
  • Mountain grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 29% in Chowchilla.
  • In Chowchilla, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Mountain grove.
  • Chowchilla has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 48%, compared to 2% in Mountain grove.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chowchilla at 9%, compared to 8% in Mountain grove.
  • In Chowchilla, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Mountain grove.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mountain grove Chowchilla
Mental Health Not Good 22.5% 20.9%
Physical Health Not Good 18.1% 15.1%
Depression 28.4% 23.3%
Smoking 31.2% 18.3%
Binge Drinking 14.8% 13.7%
Obesity 44.6% 36.7%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mountain grove vs Chowchilla

  • More residents in Mountain grove report poor mental health at 22.5% compared to 20.9% in Chowchilla.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mountain grove at 28.4% compared to 23.3% in Chowchilla.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mountain grove at 31.2% compared to 18.3% in Chowchilla.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mountain grove at 14.8% compared to 13.7% in Chowchilla.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mountain grove at 44.6% compared to 36.7% in Chowchilla.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mountain grove at 24.0% compared to 7.0% in Chowchilla.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mountain grove Chowchilla
No Schooling 0.6% (26) 1.4% (271)
High School Diploma 27.6% (1,256) 14.6% (2,738)
Less than High School 23.2% (1,057) 31.2% (5,842)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.8% (400) 9.2% (1,731)

Education Levels Comparison: Mountain grove vs Chowchilla

  • In Chowchilla, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Mountain grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mountain grove hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 14.6% in Chowchilla.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chowchilla at 31.2%, compared to 23.2% in Mountain grove.
  • In Chowchilla, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 8.8% in Mountain grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.