Demographics details for Mount vernon, VA vs Spring park, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mount vernon, VA vs Spring park, MN.

Data Mount vernon Spring park
Population 13,299 1,663
Median Age 43.4 years 55.5 years
Median Income $160,096 $48,684
Married Families 48.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Mount vernon vs Spring park

  • In Mount vernon, the population is higher at 13,299, compared to 1,663 in Spring park.
  • The median age in Spring park is higher at 55.5 years, compared to 43.4 years in Mount vernon.
  • Mount vernon has a higher median income of $160,096 compared to $48,684 in Spring park.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Mount vernon at 48.0% compared to 30.0% in Spring park.
  • The poverty level is higher in Spring park at 5%, compared to 0% in Mount vernon.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Mount vernon and Spring park at 3.2%.

Demographics

Demographics Mount vernon vs Spring park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mount vernon Spring park
Black 15 9
White 48 82
Asian 7 2
Hispanic 18 1
Two or More Races 12 3
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Mount vernon vs Spring park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mount vernon at 15% compared to 9% in Spring park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Spring park at 82% compared to 48% in Mount vernon.
  • The Asian population is larger in Mount vernon at 7% compared to 2% in Spring park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Mount vernon at 18% compared to 1% in Spring park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Mount vernon at 12% compared to 3% in Spring park.
  • In Spring park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Mount vernon.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mount vernon Spring park
Mental Health Not Good 12.7% 13.4%
Physical Health Not Good 7.7% 7.1%
Depression 17.4% 23.7%
Smoking 8.9% 11.7%
Binge Drinking 15.9% 22.5%
Obesity 26.8% 26.0%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mount vernon vs Spring park

  • In Spring park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.4% compared to 12.7% in Mount vernon.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Spring park at 23.7% versus 17.4% in Mount vernon.
  • Spring park has a higher smoking rate at 11.7% compared to 8.9% in Mount vernon.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Spring park at 22.5% compared to 15.9% in Mount vernon.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mount vernon at 26.8% compared to 26.0% in Spring park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spring park at 22.0% compared to 9.0% in Mount vernon.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mount vernon Spring park
No Schooling 0.5% (63) 0.5% (9)
High School Diploma 9.4% (1,244) 27.8% (463)
Less than High School 4.0% (536) 12.0% (200)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 45.0% (5,987) 29.1% (484)

Education Levels Comparison: Mount vernon vs Spring park

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Mount vernon and Spring park at 0.5%.
  • In Spring park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.8% compared to 9.4% in Mount vernon.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Spring park at 12.0%, compared to 4.0% in Mount vernon.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount vernon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.0% compared to 29.1% in Spring park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.