Demographics details for Mount vernon, NY vs Port clinton, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mount vernon, NY vs Port clinton, OH.

Data Mount vernon Port clinton
Population 71,714 5,966
Median Age 41.4 years 44.9 years
Median Income $75,511 $55,534
Married Families 30.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 13% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Mount vernon vs Port clinton

  • In Mount vernon, the population is higher at 71,714, compared to 5,966 in Port clinton.
  • The median age in Port clinton is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 41.4 years in Mount vernon.
  • Mount vernon has a higher median income of $75,511 compared to $55,534 in Port clinton.
  • In Port clinton, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 30.0% in Mount vernon.
  • Mount vernon has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Port clinton.
  • The unemployment rate in Mount vernon is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Port clinton.

Demographics

Demographics Mount vernon vs Port clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mount vernon Port clinton
Black 63 3
White 10 82
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 17 7
Two or More Races 7 8
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mount vernon vs Port clinton

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mount vernon at 63% compared to 3% in Port clinton.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Port clinton at 82% compared to 10% in Mount vernon.
  • The Asian population is larger in Mount vernon at 2% compared to 0% in Port clinton.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Mount vernon at 17% compared to 7% in Port clinton.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port clinton at 8%, compared to 7% in Mount vernon.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Mount vernon at 1% compared to 0% in Port clinton.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mount vernon Port clinton
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 13.5%
Depression 17.2% 25.1%
Smoking 15.7% 24.0%
Binge Drinking 14.0% 17.9%
Obesity 34.8% 40.7%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mount vernon vs Port clinton

  • In Port clinton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.2% in Mount vernon.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Port clinton at 25.1% versus 17.2% in Mount vernon.
  • Port clinton has a higher smoking rate at 24.0% compared to 15.7% in Mount vernon.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Port clinton at 17.9% compared to 14.0% in Mount vernon.
  • Port clinton has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 34.8% in Mount vernon.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port clinton at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Mount vernon.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mount vernon Port clinton
No Schooling 1.8% (1,292) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 14.2% (10,151) 21.7% (1,296)
Less than High School 15.9% (11,387) 17.1% (1,023)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.3% (18,122) 13.8% (825)

Education Levels Comparison: Mount vernon vs Port clinton

  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount vernon have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Port clinton.
  • In Port clinton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 14.2% in Mount vernon.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port clinton at 17.1%, compared to 15.9% in Mount vernon.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount vernon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 13.8% in Port clinton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.