Demographics details for Mount union, PA vs Social circle, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mount union, PA vs Social circle, GA.
| Data | Mount union | Social circle |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,267 | 5,265 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $38,382 | $68,333 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mount union vs Social circle
- The population in Social circle is higher at 5,265, compared to 2,267 in Mount union.
- The median age in Social circle is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 34.8 years in Mount union.
- Social circle has a higher median income of $68,333, compared to $38,382 in Mount union.
- In Social circle, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 25.0% in Mount union.
- Mount union has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Social circle.
- The unemployment rate in Mount union is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Social circle.
Demographics
Demographics Mount union vs Social circle provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mount union | Social circle |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 31 |
| White | 87 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mount union vs Social circle
- In Social circle, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 31% compared to 8% in Mount union.
- Mount union has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 67% in Social circle.
- Both Mount union and Social circle have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Social circle has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Mount union.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mount union at 4% compared to 0% in Social circle.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mount union and Social circle at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mount union | Social circle |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.7% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 25.6% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 26.4% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 43.0% | 38.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mount union vs Social circle
- More residents in Mount union report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 18.1% in Social circle.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mount union at 25.6% compared to 22.4% in Social circle.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mount union at 26.4% compared to 19.5% in Social circle.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mount union at 16.4% compared to 15.3% in Social circle.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mount union at 43.0% compared to 38.3% in Social circle.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mount union at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Social circle.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mount union | Social circle |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (43) | 0.7% (39) |
| High School Diploma | 28.5% (646) | 16.6% (872) |
| Less than High School | 16.3% (370) | 8.8% (462) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.3% (142) | 17.4% (914) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mount union vs Social circle
- A higher percentage of residents in Mount union have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.7% in Social circle.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mount union hold a high school diploma at 28.5% compared to 16.6% in Social circle.
- More residents in Mount union have less than a high school education at 16.3% compared to 8.8% in Social circle.
- In Social circle, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 6.3% in Mount union.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.