Demographics details for Mount union, PA vs Roseville, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mount union, PA vs Roseville, MI.
| Data | Mount union | Roseville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,267 | 46,812 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 40.7 years |
| Median Income | $38,382 | $57,274 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.3 |
Population Comparison: Mount union vs Roseville
- The population in Roseville is higher at 46,812, compared to 2,267 in Mount union.
- The median age in Roseville is higher at 40.7 years, compared to 34.8 years in Mount union.
- Roseville has a higher median income of $57,274, compared to $38,382 in Mount union.
- In Roseville, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 25.0% in Mount union.
- The poverty level is identical in both Mount union and Roseville at 12%.
- Roseville has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 4.2% in Mount union.
Demographics
Demographics Mount union vs Roseville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mount union | Roseville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 23 |
| White | 87 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mount union vs Roseville
- In Roseville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 8% in Mount union.
- Mount union has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 67% in Roseville.
- In Roseville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Mount union.
- Roseville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Mount union.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Roseville at 5%, compared to 4% in Mount union.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mount union and Roseville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mount union | Roseville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.7% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.6% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 26.4% | 23.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 43.0% | 40.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mount union vs Roseville
- More residents in Mount union report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 19.7% in Roseville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Roseville at 26.9% versus 25.6% in Mount union.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mount union at 26.4% compared to 23.6% in Roseville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Roseville at 17.4% compared to 16.4% in Mount union.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mount union at 43.0% compared to 40.3% in Roseville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mount union at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in Roseville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mount union | Roseville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (43) | 1.2% (563) |
| High School Diploma | 28.5% (646) | 21.9% (10,268) |
| Less than High School | 16.3% (370) | 14.8% (6,925) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.3% (142) | 10.3% (4,839) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mount union vs Roseville
- A higher percentage of residents in Mount union have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.2% in Roseville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mount union hold a high school diploma at 28.5% compared to 21.9% in Roseville.
- More residents in Mount union have less than a high school education at 16.3% compared to 14.8% in Roseville.
- In Roseville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 6.3% in Mount union.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.