Demographics details for Mount pocono, PA vs Fort morgan, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mount pocono, PA vs Fort morgan, CO.

Data Mount pocono Fort morgan
Population 3,071 11,453
Median Age 38.5 years 32.8 years
Median Income $81,127 $55,407
Married Families 30.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 10% 11%
Unemployment Rate 4.8 2.5

Population Comparison: Mount pocono vs Fort morgan

  • The population in Fort morgan is higher at 11,453, compared to 3,071 in Mount pocono.
  • Residents in Mount pocono have a higher median age of 38.5 years compared to 32.8 years in Fort morgan.
  • Mount pocono has a higher median income of $81,127 compared to $55,407 in Fort morgan.
  • In Fort morgan, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 30.0% in Mount pocono.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort morgan at 11%, compared to 10% in Mount pocono.
  • The unemployment rate in Mount pocono is higher at 4.8%, compared to 2.5% in Fort morgan.

Demographics

Demographics Mount pocono vs Fort morgan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mount pocono Fort morgan
Black 16 8
White 41 16
Asian 6 Data is updating
Hispanic 33 49
Two or More Races 4 23
American Indian Data is updating 4

Demographics Comparison: Mount pocono vs Fort morgan

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mount pocono at 16% compared to 8% in Fort morgan.
  • Mount pocono has a higher percentage of White residents at 41% compared to 16% in Fort morgan.
  • The Asian population is larger in Mount pocono at 6% compared to 0% in Fort morgan.
  • Fort morgan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 33% in Mount pocono.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort morgan at 23%, compared to 4% in Mount pocono.
  • In Fort morgan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Mount pocono.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mount pocono Fort morgan
Mental Health Not Good 16.1% 17.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 13.5%
Depression 20.1% 21.7%
Smoking 18.1% 18.7%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 17.6%
Obesity 34.3% 29.3%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mount pocono vs Fort morgan

  • In Fort morgan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.1% in Mount pocono.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fort morgan at 21.7% versus 20.1% in Mount pocono.
  • Fort morgan has a higher smoking rate at 18.7% compared to 18.1% in Mount pocono.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort morgan at 17.6% compared to 16.1% in Mount pocono.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mount pocono at 34.3% compared to 29.3% in Fort morgan.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mount pocono at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort morgan.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mount pocono Fort morgan
No Schooling 3.2% (98) 4.3% (496)
High School Diploma 27.4% (842) 16.0% (1,831)
Less than High School 18.1% (555) 25.8% (2,957)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.9% (488) 11.5% (1,312)

Education Levels Comparison: Mount pocono vs Fort morgan

  • In Fort morgan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 3.2% in Mount pocono.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount pocono hold a high school diploma at 27.4% compared to 16.0% in Fort morgan.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort morgan at 25.8%, compared to 18.1% in Mount pocono.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount pocono hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 11.5% in Fort morgan.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.