Environment details: Mount pleasant SC
water quality is good overall; local impacts considered.
Environment details: South pasadena CA
water quality is average; monitoring is necessary.
Compare Environment: Mount pleasant SC vs South pasadena CA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Mount pleasant | South pasadena |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 555 | 2592 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is good overall; local impacts considered. | water quality is average; monitoring is necessary. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.99 | 2.97 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 81 | 205 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Mount pleasant vs South pasadena
- Water quality is rated higher in Mount pleasant at 7/10 compared to 5/10 in South pasadena.
- South pasadena has a better median air quality index at 3.0 compared to 2.0 in Mount pleasant.
- Air quality is better in South pasadena with an average index of 2.97 compared to 1.99 in Mount pleasant.
- South pasadena experiences more days with poor air quality at 205 compared to 81 in Mount pleasant.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.