Demographics details for Mount pleasant, SC vs Nanticoke, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mount pleasant, SC vs Nanticoke, PA.

Data Mount pleasant Nanticoke
Population 94,545 10,607
Median Age 42.4 years 42.0 years
Median Income $115,167 $56,238
Married Families 47.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 5% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 7.2

Population Comparison: Mount pleasant vs Nanticoke

  • In Mount pleasant, the population is higher at 94,545, compared to 10,607 in Nanticoke.
  • Residents in Mount pleasant have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 42.0 years in Nanticoke.
  • Mount pleasant has a higher median income of $115,167 compared to $56,238 in Nanticoke.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Mount pleasant at 47.0% compared to 34.0% in Nanticoke.
  • The poverty level is higher in Nanticoke at 12%, compared to 5% in Mount pleasant.
  • Nanticoke has a higher unemployment rate at 7.2% compared to 3.2% in Mount pleasant.

Demographics

Demographics Mount pleasant vs Nanticoke provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mount pleasant Nanticoke
Black 4 6
White 90 76
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 11
Two or More Races 2 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mount pleasant vs Nanticoke

  • In Nanticoke, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 4% in Mount pleasant.
  • Mount pleasant has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 76% in Nanticoke.
  • The Asian population is larger in Mount pleasant at 2% compared to 0% in Nanticoke.
  • Nanticoke has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 2% in Mount pleasant.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Nanticoke at 7%, compared to 2% in Mount pleasant.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mount pleasant and Nanticoke at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mount pleasant Nanticoke
Mental Health Not Good 13.7% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 7.6% 13.7%
Depression 19.5% 23.9%
Smoking 9.8% 24.0%
Binge Drinking 25.5% 17.3%
Obesity 26.9% 38.2%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mount pleasant vs Nanticoke

  • In Nanticoke, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 13.7% in Mount pleasant.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Nanticoke at 23.9% versus 19.5% in Mount pleasant.
  • Nanticoke has a higher smoking rate at 24.0% compared to 9.8% in Mount pleasant.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mount pleasant at 25.5% compared to 17.3% in Nanticoke.
  • Nanticoke has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 26.9% in Mount pleasant.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Nanticoke at 20.0% compared to 6.0% in Mount pleasant.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mount pleasant Nanticoke
No Schooling 0.3% (259) 1.3% (140)
High School Diploma 5.8% (5,499) 23.7% (2,518)
Less than High School 2.7% (2,577) 19.6% (2,077)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 46.2% (43,679) 14.1% (1,491)

Education Levels Comparison: Mount pleasant vs Nanticoke

  • In Nanticoke, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.3% in Mount pleasant.
  • In Nanticoke, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.7% compared to 5.8% in Mount pleasant.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Nanticoke at 19.6%, compared to 2.7% in Mount pleasant.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount pleasant hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.2% compared to 14.1% in Nanticoke.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.