Demographics details for Mount pleasant, SC vs Muldraugh, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mount pleasant, SC vs Muldraugh, KY.

Data Mount pleasant Muldraugh
Population 94,545 1,019
Median Age 42.4 years 39.6 years
Median Income $115,167 $49,375
Married Families 47.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 5% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Mount pleasant vs Muldraugh

  • In Mount pleasant, the population is higher at 94,545, compared to 1,019 in Muldraugh.
  • Residents in Mount pleasant have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 39.6 years in Muldraugh.
  • Mount pleasant has a higher median income of $115,167 compared to $49,375 in Muldraugh.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Mount pleasant at 47.0% compared to 25.0% in Muldraugh.
  • The poverty level is higher in Muldraugh at 15%, compared to 5% in Mount pleasant.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Mount pleasant and Muldraugh at 3.2%.

Demographics

Demographics Mount pleasant vs Muldraugh provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mount pleasant Muldraugh
Black 4 4
White 90 83
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 9
Two or More Races 2 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mount pleasant vs Muldraugh

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Mount pleasant and Muldraugh at 4%.
  • Mount pleasant has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 83% in Muldraugh.
  • The Asian population is larger in Mount pleasant at 2% compared to 0% in Muldraugh.
  • Muldraugh has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 2% in Mount pleasant.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Muldraugh at 4%, compared to 2% in Mount pleasant.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mount pleasant and Muldraugh at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mount pleasant Muldraugh
Mental Health Not Good 13.7% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 7.6% 16.6%
Depression 19.5% 30.2%
Smoking 9.8% 27.7%
Binge Drinking 25.5% 13.6%
Obesity 26.9% 42.3%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 40.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mount pleasant vs Muldraugh

  • In Muldraugh, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 13.7% in Mount pleasant.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Muldraugh at 30.2% versus 19.5% in Mount pleasant.
  • Muldraugh has a higher smoking rate at 27.7% compared to 9.8% in Mount pleasant.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mount pleasant at 25.5% compared to 13.6% in Muldraugh.
  • Muldraugh has higher obesity rates at 42.3% compared to 26.9% in Mount pleasant.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Muldraugh at 40.0% compared to 6.0% in Mount pleasant.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mount pleasant Muldraugh
No Schooling 0.3% (259) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 5.8% (5,499) 36.4% (371)
Less than High School 2.7% (2,577) 13.7% (140)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 46.2% (43,679) 5.1% (52)

Education Levels Comparison: Mount pleasant vs Muldraugh

  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount pleasant have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Muldraugh.
  • In Muldraugh, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 36.4% compared to 5.8% in Mount pleasant.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Muldraugh at 13.7%, compared to 2.7% in Mount pleasant.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount pleasant hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 46.2% compared to 5.1% in Muldraugh.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.