Demographics details for Mount olive, MS vs Los angeles, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mount olive, MS vs Los angeles, CA.
| Data | Mount olive | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 878 | 3,822,238 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $53,947 | $76,244 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Mount olive vs Los angeles
- The population in Los angeles is higher at 3,822,238, compared to 878 in Mount olive.
- The median age in Los angeles is higher at 36.5 years, compared to 31.7 years in Mount olive.
- Los angeles has a higher median income of $76,244, compared to $53,947 in Mount olive.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mount olive at 49.0% compared to 33.0% in Los angeles.
- Mount olive has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 17% in Los angeles.
- The unemployment rate in Mount olive is higher at 6.5%, compared to 6.0% in Los angeles.
Demographics
Demographics Mount olive vs Los angeles provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mount olive | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 120 | 9 |
| White | 145 | 16 |
| Asian | 2 | 12 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 49 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mount olive vs Los angeles
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mount olive at 120% compared to 9% in Los angeles.
- Mount olive has a higher percentage of White residents at 145% compared to 16% in Los angeles.
- In Los angeles, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 2% in Mount olive.
- Los angeles has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 0% in Mount olive.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Los angeles at 13%, compared to 0% in Mount olive.
- In Los angeles, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mount olive.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mount olive | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 16.1% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 43.6% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mount olive vs Los angeles
- More residents in Mount olive report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.8% in Los angeles.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mount olive at 21.5% compared to 16.1% in Los angeles.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mount olive at 21.3% compared to 11.8% in Los angeles.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Los angeles at 14.9% compared to 13.0% in Mount olive.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mount olive at 43.6% compared to 29.5% in Los angeles.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mount olive at 27.0% compared to 10.0% in Los angeles.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mount olive | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (20) | 3.0% (116,335) |
| High School Diploma | 23.9% (210) | 12.1% (461,986) |
| Less than High School | 14.9% (131) | 28.8% (1,101,987) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (114) | 26.2% (1,002,780) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mount olive vs Los angeles
- In Los angeles, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 2.3% in Mount olive.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mount olive hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 12.1% in Los angeles.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Los angeles at 28.8%, compared to 14.9% in Mount olive.
- In Los angeles, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 13.0% in Mount olive.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.