Demographics details for Mount olive, MS vs Heber springs, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mount olive, MS vs Heber springs, AR.

Data Mount olive Heber springs
Population 878 7,201
Median Age 31.7 years 43.1 years
Median Income $53,947 $50,472
Married Families 49.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 18% 12%
Unemployment Rate 6.5 4.0

Population Comparison: Mount olive vs Heber springs

  • The population in Heber springs is higher at 7,201, compared to 878 in Mount olive.
  • The median age in Heber springs is higher at 43.1 years, compared to 31.7 years in Mount olive.
  • Mount olive has a higher median income of $53,947 compared to $50,472 in Heber springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Mount olive at 49.0% compared to 41.0% in Heber springs.
  • Mount olive has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in Heber springs.
  • The unemployment rate in Mount olive is higher at 6.5%, compared to 4.0% in Heber springs.

Demographics

Demographics Mount olive vs Heber springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mount olive Heber springs
Black 120 1
White 145 92
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 3
Two or More Races Data is updating 3
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Mount olive vs Heber springs

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mount olive at 120% compared to 1% in Heber springs.
  • Mount olive has a higher percentage of White residents at 145% compared to 92% in Heber springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Mount olive at 2% compared to 0% in Heber springs.
  • Heber springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Mount olive.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Heber springs at 3%, compared to 0% in Mount olive.
  • In Heber springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mount olive.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mount olive Heber springs
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 12.5%
Depression 21.5% 26.3%
Smoking 21.3% 20.5%
Binge Drinking 13.0% 16.2%
Obesity 43.6% 36.2%
Disability Percentage 27.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mount olive vs Heber springs

  • In Heber springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 17.8% in Mount olive.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Heber springs at 26.3% versus 21.5% in Mount olive.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mount olive at 21.3% compared to 20.5% in Heber springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Heber springs at 16.2% compared to 13.0% in Mount olive.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mount olive at 43.6% compared to 36.2% in Heber springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mount olive at 27.0% compared to 20.0% in Heber springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mount olive Heber springs
No Schooling 2.3% (20) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 23.9% (210) 23.5% (1,694)
Less than High School 14.9% (131) 15.1% (1,088)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.0% (114) 10.5% (756)

Education Levels Comparison: Mount olive vs Heber springs

  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount olive have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.0% in Heber springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount olive hold a high school diploma at 23.9% compared to 23.5% in Heber springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Heber springs at 15.1%, compared to 14.9% in Mount olive.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount olive hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 10.5% in Heber springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.