Demographics details for Mount juliet, TN vs Greenwich, CT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mount juliet, TN vs Greenwich, CT.

Data Mount juliet Greenwich
Population 42,548 62,396
Median Age 39.2 years 42.3 years
Median Income $108,066 $250,000
Married Families 45.0% 62.2%
Poverty Level 5% 4%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 2.3

Population Comparison: Mount juliet vs Greenwich

  • The population in Greenwich is higher at 62,396, compared to 42,548 in Mount juliet.
  • The median age in Greenwich is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 39.2 years in Mount juliet.
  • Greenwich has a higher median income of $250,000, compared to $108,066 in Mount juliet.
  • In Greenwich, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.2%, compared to 45.0% in Mount juliet.
  • Mount juliet has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 4% in Greenwich.
  • The unemployment rate in Mount juliet is higher at 2.8%, compared to 2.3% in Greenwich.

Demographics

Demographics Mount juliet vs Greenwich provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mount juliet Greenwich
Black 7 2
White 79 80
Asian 4 10
Hispanic 6 6
Two or More Races 4 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mount juliet vs Greenwich

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mount juliet at 7% compared to 2% in Greenwich.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Greenwich at 80% compared to 79% in Mount juliet.
  • In Greenwich, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 4% in Mount juliet.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Mount juliet and Greenwich at 6%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Mount juliet at 4% compared to 2% in Greenwich.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mount juliet and Greenwich at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mount juliet Greenwich
Mental Health Not Good 16.0% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 10.0% Data is updating%
Depression 25.7% Data is updating%
Smoking 15.2% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.8% Data is updating%
Obesity 29.9% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 7.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mount juliet vs Greenwich

  • More residents in Mount juliet report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mount juliet at 25.7% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mount juliet at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mount juliet at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mount juliet at 29.9% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mount juliet at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mount juliet Greenwich
No Schooling 0.4% (173) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 10.4% (4,408) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 3.9% (1,653) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 29.4% (12,510) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Mount juliet vs Greenwich

  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount juliet have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount juliet hold a high school diploma at 10.4% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
  • More residents in Mount juliet have less than a high school education at 3.9% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount juliet hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.