Demographics details for Mount juliet, TN vs Glencoe, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mount juliet, TN vs Glencoe, KY.

Data Mount juliet Glencoe
Population 42,548 351
Median Age 39.2 years 34.4 years
Median Income $108,066 $43,438
Married Families 45.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 5% 10%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Mount juliet vs Glencoe

  • In Mount juliet, the population is higher at 42,548, compared to 351 in Glencoe.
  • Residents in Mount juliet have a higher median age of 39.2 years compared to 34.4 years in Glencoe.
  • Mount juliet has a higher median income of $108,066 compared to $43,438 in Glencoe.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Mount juliet at 45.0% compared to 36.0% in Glencoe.
  • The poverty level is higher in Glencoe at 10%, compared to 5% in Mount juliet.
  • Glencoe has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.8% in Mount juliet.

Demographics

Demographics Mount juliet vs Glencoe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mount juliet Glencoe
Black 7 Data is updating
White 79 89
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 6 8
Two or More Races 4 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mount juliet vs Glencoe

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mount juliet at 7% compared to 0% in Glencoe.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Glencoe at 89% compared to 79% in Mount juliet.
  • The Asian population is larger in Mount juliet at 4% compared to 0% in Glencoe.
  • Glencoe has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 6% in Mount juliet.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Mount juliet at 4% compared to 3% in Glencoe.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mount juliet and Glencoe at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mount juliet Glencoe
Mental Health Not Good 16.0% 19.9%
Physical Health Not Good 10.0% 14.8%
Depression 25.7% 28.7%
Smoking 15.2% 24.4%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 15.3%
Obesity 29.9% 38.0%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mount juliet vs Glencoe

  • In Glencoe, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 16.0% in Mount juliet.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Glencoe at 28.7% versus 25.7% in Mount juliet.
  • Glencoe has a higher smoking rate at 24.4% compared to 15.2% in Mount juliet.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mount juliet at 16.8% compared to 15.3% in Glencoe.
  • Glencoe has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 29.9% in Mount juliet.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Glencoe at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Mount juliet.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mount juliet Glencoe
No Schooling 0.4% (173) 2.0% (7)
High School Diploma 10.4% (4,408) 21.7% (76)
Less than High School 3.9% (1,653) 19.9% (70)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 29.4% (12,510) 2.3% (8)

Education Levels Comparison: Mount juliet vs Glencoe

  • In Glencoe, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.4% in Mount juliet.
  • In Glencoe, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 10.4% in Mount juliet.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Glencoe at 19.9%, compared to 3.9% in Mount juliet.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount juliet hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 2.3% in Glencoe.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.