Demographics details for Mount juliet, TN vs Forest lake, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mount juliet, TN vs Forest lake, MN.

Data Mount juliet Forest lake
Population 42,548 20,857
Median Age 39.2 years 37.9 years
Median Income $108,066 $91,157
Married Families 45.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 5% 6%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 3.2

Population Comparison: Mount juliet vs Forest lake

  • In Mount juliet, the population is higher at 42,548, compared to 20,857 in Forest lake.
  • Residents in Mount juliet have a higher median age of 39.2 years compared to 37.9 years in Forest lake.
  • Mount juliet has a higher median income of $108,066 compared to $91,157 in Forest lake.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Mount juliet at 45.0% compared to 42.0% in Forest lake.
  • The poverty level is higher in Forest lake at 6%, compared to 5% in Mount juliet.
  • Forest lake has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.8% in Mount juliet.

Demographics

Demographics Mount juliet vs Forest lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mount juliet Forest lake
Black 7 3
White 79 81
Asian 4 4
Hispanic 6 6
Two or More Races 4 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mount juliet vs Forest lake

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mount juliet at 7% compared to 3% in Forest lake.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Forest lake at 81% compared to 79% in Mount juliet.
  • Both Mount juliet and Forest lake have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Mount juliet and Forest lake at 6%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Forest lake at 6%, compared to 4% in Mount juliet.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mount juliet and Forest lake at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mount juliet Forest lake
Mental Health Not Good 16.0% 14.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.0% 8.8%
Depression 25.7% 24.1%
Smoking 15.2% 15.7%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 21.4%
Obesity 29.9% 32.9%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mount juliet vs Forest lake

  • More residents in Mount juliet report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 14.7% in Forest lake.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mount juliet at 25.7% compared to 24.1% in Forest lake.
  • Forest lake has a higher smoking rate at 15.7% compared to 15.2% in Mount juliet.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Forest lake at 21.4% compared to 16.8% in Mount juliet.
  • Forest lake has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 29.9% in Mount juliet.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Forest lake at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Mount juliet.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mount juliet Forest lake
No Schooling 0.4% (173) 0.5% (101)
High School Diploma 10.4% (4,408) 14.6% (3,055)
Less than High School 3.9% (1,653) 7.7% (1,615)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 29.4% (12,510) 24.6% (5,123)

Education Levels Comparison: Mount juliet vs Forest lake

  • In Forest lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Mount juliet.
  • In Forest lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.6% compared to 10.4% in Mount juliet.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest lake at 7.7%, compared to 3.9% in Mount juliet.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount juliet hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 24.6% in Forest lake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.