Demographics details for Mount juliet, TN vs Covington, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mount juliet, TN vs Covington, VA.
Data | Mount juliet | Covington |
---|---|---|
Population | 42,548 | 5,679 |
Median Age | 39.2 years | 41.9 years |
Median Income | $108,066 | $45,737 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Mount juliet vs Covington
- In Mount juliet, the population is higher at 42,548, compared to 5,679 in Covington.
- The median age in Covington is higher at 41.9 years, compared to 39.2 years in Mount juliet.
- Mount juliet has a higher median income of $108,066 compared to $45,737 in Covington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mount juliet at 45.0% compared to 43.0% in Covington.
- The poverty level is higher in Covington at 13%, compared to 5% in Mount juliet.
- Covington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 2.8% in Mount juliet.
Demographics
Demographics Mount juliet vs Covington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mount juliet | Covington |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 14 |
White | 79 | 79 |
Asian | 4 | 1 |
Hispanic | 6 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mount juliet vs Covington
- In Covington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 7% in Mount juliet.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Mount juliet and Covington at 79%.
- The Asian population is larger in Mount juliet at 4% compared to 1% in Covington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mount juliet at 6% compared to 2% in Covington.
- Both Mount juliet and Covington have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mount juliet and Covington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mount juliet | Covington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 13.1% |
Depression | 25.7% | 24.8% |
Smoking | 15.2% | 21.6% |
Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 29.9% | 39.9% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mount juliet vs Covington
- In Covington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Mount juliet.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mount juliet at 25.7% compared to 24.8% in Covington.
- Covington has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 15.2% in Mount juliet.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mount juliet at 16.8% compared to 16.6% in Covington.
- Covington has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 29.9% in Mount juliet.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Covington at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Mount juliet.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mount juliet | Covington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (173) | 0.2% (11) |
High School Diploma | 10.4% (4,408) | 29.8% (1,691) |
Less than High School | 3.9% (1,653) | 14.2% (808) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.4% (12,510) | 8.0% (455) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mount juliet vs Covington
- A higher percentage of residents in Mount juliet have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Covington.
- In Covington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.8% compared to 10.4% in Mount juliet.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Covington at 14.2%, compared to 3.9% in Mount juliet.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mount juliet hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 8.0% in Covington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.