Demographics details for Mount juliet, TN vs Cashion, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mount juliet, TN vs Cashion, OK.
Data | Mount juliet | Cashion |
---|---|---|
Population | 42,548 | 892 |
Median Age | 39.2 years | 33.3 years |
Median Income | $108,066 | $96,705 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 58.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mount juliet vs Cashion
- In Mount juliet, the population is higher at 42,548, compared to 892 in Cashion.
- Residents in Mount juliet have a higher median age of 39.2 years compared to 33.3 years in Cashion.
- Mount juliet has a higher median income of $108,066 compared to $96,705 in Cashion.
- In Cashion, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 45.0% in Mount juliet.
- The poverty level is higher in Cashion at 7%, compared to 5% in Mount juliet.
- Cashion has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.8% in Mount juliet.
Demographics
Demographics Mount juliet vs Cashion provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mount juliet | Cashion |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 2 |
White | 79 | 53 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 6 | 22 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 22 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mount juliet vs Cashion
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mount juliet at 7% compared to 2% in Cashion.
- Mount juliet has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 53% in Cashion.
- The Asian population is larger in Mount juliet at 4% compared to 0% in Cashion.
- Cashion has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 6% in Mount juliet.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cashion at 22%, compared to 4% in Mount juliet.
- In Cashion, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mount juliet.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mount juliet | Cashion |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 16.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 10.3% |
Depression | 25.7% | 24.0% |
Smoking | 15.2% | 15.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 29.9% | 36.9% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mount juliet vs Cashion
- In Cashion, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.0% in Mount juliet.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mount juliet at 25.7% compared to 24.0% in Cashion.
- Cashion has a higher smoking rate at 15.4% compared to 15.2% in Mount juliet.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mount juliet at 16.8% compared to 15.9% in Cashion.
- Cashion has higher obesity rates at 36.9% compared to 29.9% in Mount juliet.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cashion at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Mount juliet.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mount juliet | Cashion |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (173) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 10.4% (4,408) | 25.8% (230) |
Less than High School | 3.9% (1,653) | 5.2% (46) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.4% (12,510) | 24.4% (218) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mount juliet vs Cashion
- A higher percentage of residents in Mount juliet have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Cashion.
- In Cashion, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.8% compared to 10.4% in Mount juliet.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cashion at 5.2%, compared to 3.9% in Mount juliet.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mount juliet hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 24.4% in Cashion.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.