Demographics details for Mount juliet, TN vs Bell gardens, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mount juliet, TN vs Bell gardens, CA.

Data Mount juliet Bell gardens
Population 42,548 37,927
Median Age 39.2 years 31.1 years
Median Income $108,066 $53,935
Married Families 45.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 5% 15%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 6.7

Population Comparison: Mount juliet vs Bell gardens

  • In Mount juliet, the population is higher at 42,548, compared to 37,927 in Bell gardens.
  • Residents in Mount juliet have a higher median age of 39.2 years compared to 31.1 years in Bell gardens.
  • Mount juliet has a higher median income of $108,066 compared to $53,935 in Bell gardens.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Mount juliet at 45.0% compared to 27.0% in Bell gardens.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bell gardens at 15%, compared to 5% in Mount juliet.
  • Bell gardens has a higher unemployment rate at 6.7% compared to 2.8% in Mount juliet.

Demographics

Demographics Mount juliet vs Bell gardens provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mount juliet Bell gardens
Black 7 1
White 79 -35
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 6 99
Two or More Races 4 34
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Mount juliet vs Bell gardens

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mount juliet at 7% compared to 1% in Bell gardens.
  • Mount juliet has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to -35% in Bell gardens.
  • The Asian population is larger in Mount juliet at 4% compared to 0% in Bell gardens.
  • Bell gardens has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 99%, compared to 6% in Mount juliet.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bell gardens at 34%, compared to 4% in Mount juliet.
  • In Bell gardens, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mount juliet.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mount juliet Bell gardens
Mental Health Not Good 16.0% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 10.0% 17.9%
Depression 25.7% 17.5%
Smoking 15.2% 16.2%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 13.3%
Obesity 29.9% 37.2%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mount juliet vs Bell gardens

  • In Bell gardens, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 16.0% in Mount juliet.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mount juliet at 25.7% compared to 17.5% in Bell gardens.
  • Bell gardens has a higher smoking rate at 16.2% compared to 15.2% in Mount juliet.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mount juliet at 16.8% compared to 13.3% in Bell gardens.
  • Bell gardens has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 29.9% in Mount juliet.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Mount juliet and Bell gardens at 7.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mount juliet Bell gardens
No Schooling 0.4% (173) 4.5% (1,722)
High School Diploma 10.4% (4,408) 16.9% (6,418)
Less than High School 3.9% (1,653) 60.8% (23,053)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 29.4% (12,510) 3.9% (1,476)

Education Levels Comparison: Mount juliet vs Bell gardens

  • In Bell gardens, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.4% in Mount juliet.
  • In Bell gardens, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 10.4% in Mount juliet.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bell gardens at 60.8%, compared to 3.9% in Mount juliet.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount juliet hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 3.9% in Bell gardens.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.