Demographics details for Mount juliet, TN vs Arlington heights, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mount juliet, TN vs Arlington heights, IL.

Data Mount juliet Arlington heights
Population 42,548 75,195
Median Age 39.2 years 42.8 years
Median Income $108,066 $113,502
Married Families 45.0% 49.0%
Poverty Level 5% 5%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 5.1

Population Comparison: Mount juliet vs Arlington heights

  • The population in Arlington heights is higher at 75,195, compared to 42,548 in Mount juliet.
  • The median age in Arlington heights is higher at 42.8 years, compared to 39.2 years in Mount juliet.
  • Arlington heights has a higher median income of $113,502, compared to $108,066 in Mount juliet.
  • In Arlington heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 45.0% in Mount juliet.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Mount juliet and Arlington heights at 5%.
  • Arlington heights has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 2.8% in Mount juliet.

Demographics

Demographics Mount juliet vs Arlington heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mount juliet Arlington heights
Black 7 3
White 79 71
Asian 4 11
Hispanic 6 9
Two or More Races 4 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mount juliet vs Arlington heights

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mount juliet at 7% compared to 3% in Arlington heights.
  • Mount juliet has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 71% in Arlington heights.
  • In Arlington heights, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 4% in Mount juliet.
  • Arlington heights has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 6% in Mount juliet.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Arlington heights at 6%, compared to 4% in Mount juliet.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mount juliet and Arlington heights at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mount juliet Arlington heights
Mental Health Not Good 16.0% 12.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.0% 7.8%
Depression 25.7% 17.3%
Smoking 15.2% 10.1%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 20.0%
Obesity 29.9% 25.4%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mount juliet vs Arlington heights

  • More residents in Mount juliet report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 12.3% in Arlington heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mount juliet at 25.7% compared to 17.3% in Arlington heights.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mount juliet at 15.2% compared to 10.1% in Arlington heights.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Arlington heights at 20.0% compared to 16.8% in Mount juliet.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mount juliet at 29.9% compared to 25.4% in Arlington heights.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Arlington heights at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Mount juliet.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mount juliet Arlington heights
No Schooling 0.4% (173) 0.4% (329)
High School Diploma 10.4% (4,408) 10.5% (7,880)
Less than High School 3.9% (1,653) 5.0% (3,740)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 29.4% (12,510) 44.1% (33,171)

Education Levels Comparison: Mount juliet vs Arlington heights

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Mount juliet and Arlington heights at 0.4%.
  • In Arlington heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.5% compared to 10.4% in Mount juliet.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Arlington heights at 5.0%, compared to 3.9% in Mount juliet.
  • In Arlington heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.1% compared to 29.4% in Mount juliet.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.