Demographics details for Mount dora, FL vs Grand rapids, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mount dora, FL vs Grand rapids, MI.

Data Mount dora Grand rapids
Population 17,160 196,908
Median Age 48.6 years 31.8 years
Median Income $65,774 $61,634
Married Families 43.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 12% 14%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 5.3

Population Comparison: Mount dora vs Grand rapids

  • The population in Grand rapids is higher at 196,908, compared to 17,160 in Mount dora.
  • Residents in Mount dora have a higher median age of 48.6 years compared to 31.8 years in Grand rapids.
  • Mount dora has a higher median income of $65,774 compared to $61,634 in Grand rapids.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Mount dora at 43.0% compared to 31.0% in Grand rapids.
  • The poverty level is higher in Grand rapids at 14%, compared to 12% in Mount dora.
  • Grand rapids has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.2% in Mount dora.

Demographics

Demographics Mount dora vs Grand rapids provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mount dora Grand rapids
Black 13 18
White 65 51
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 15 16
Two or More Races 7 11
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Mount dora vs Grand rapids

  • In Grand rapids, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 13% in Mount dora.
  • Mount dora has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 51% in Grand rapids.
  • In Grand rapids, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Mount dora.
  • Grand rapids has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 15% in Mount dora.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand rapids at 11%, compared to 7% in Mount dora.
  • In Grand rapids, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mount dora.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mount dora Grand rapids
Mental Health Not Good 17.0% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 11.5%
Depression 20.8% 25.3%
Smoking 20.4% 17.3%
Binge Drinking 15.0% 16.7%
Obesity 37.5% 34.9%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mount dora vs Grand rapids

  • In Grand rapids, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 17.0% in Mount dora.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Grand rapids at 25.3% versus 20.8% in Mount dora.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mount dora at 20.4% compared to 17.3% in Grand rapids.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand rapids at 16.7% compared to 15.0% in Mount dora.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mount dora at 37.5% compared to 34.9% in Grand rapids.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mount dora at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Grand rapids.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mount dora Grand rapids
No Schooling 0.3% (47) 1.2% (2,304)
High School Diploma 16.5% (2,834) 12.4% (24,420)
Less than High School 8.2% (1,409) 12.2% (23,971)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.6% (4,390) 25.6% (50,441)

Education Levels Comparison: Mount dora vs Grand rapids

  • In Grand rapids, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Mount dora.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount dora hold a high school diploma at 16.5% compared to 12.4% in Grand rapids.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grand rapids at 12.2%, compared to 8.2% in Mount dora.
  • The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Mount dora and Grand rapids at 25.6%.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.