Demographics details for Mount dora, FL vs Cicero, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mount dora, FL vs Cicero, IL.
| Data | Mount dora | Cicero |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,160 | 81,919 |
| Median Age | 48.6 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $65,774 | $64,325 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 6.4 |
Population Comparison: Mount dora vs Cicero
- The population in Cicero is higher at 81,919, compared to 17,160 in Mount dora.
- Residents in Mount dora have a higher median age of 48.6 years compared to 33.4 years in Cicero.
- Mount dora has a higher median income of $65,774 compared to $64,325 in Cicero.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mount dora at 43.0% compared to 32.0% in Cicero.
- The poverty level is higher in Cicero at 14%, compared to 12% in Mount dora.
- Cicero has a higher unemployment rate at 6.4% compared to 3.2% in Mount dora.
Demographics
Demographics Mount dora vs Cicero provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mount dora | Cicero |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | 4 |
| White | 65 | -10 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 90 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mount dora vs Cicero
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mount dora at 13% compared to 4% in Cicero.
- Mount dora has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to -10% in Cicero.
- In Cicero, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Mount dora.
- Cicero has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 90%, compared to 15% in Mount dora.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cicero at 14%, compared to 7% in Mount dora.
- In Cicero, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mount dora.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mount dora | Cicero |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 15.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 20.4% | 16.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mount dora vs Cicero
- More residents in Mount dora report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.3% in Cicero.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mount dora at 20.8% compared to 16.8% in Cicero.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mount dora at 20.4% compared to 16.5% in Cicero.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cicero at 16.2% compared to 15.0% in Mount dora.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mount dora at 37.5% compared to 36.8% in Cicero.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mount dora at 16.0% compared to 6.0% in Cicero.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mount dora | Cicero |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (47) | 3.2% (2,662) |
| High School Diploma | 16.5% (2,834) | 19.6% (16,037) |
| Less than High School | 8.2% (1,409) | 38.2% (31,314) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.6% (4,390) | 7.1% (5,829) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mount dora vs Cicero
- In Cicero, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.3% in Mount dora.
- In Cicero, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.6% compared to 16.5% in Mount dora.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cicero at 38.2%, compared to 8.2% in Mount dora.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mount dora hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.6% compared to 7.1% in Cicero.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.