Demographics details for Mount clemens, MI vs Riverbank, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mount clemens, MI vs Riverbank, CA.

Data Mount clemens Riverbank
Population 15,409 24,826
Median Age 40.2 years 33.6 years
Median Income $55,154 $89,504
Married Families 30.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.2

Population Comparison: Mount clemens vs Riverbank

  • The population in Riverbank is higher at 24,826, compared to 15,409 in Mount clemens.
  • Residents in Mount clemens have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 33.6 years in Riverbank.
  • Riverbank has a higher median income of $89,504, compared to $55,154 in Mount clemens.
  • In Riverbank, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 30.0% in Mount clemens.
  • Mount clemens has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Riverbank.
  • Riverbank has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Mount clemens.

Demographics

Demographics Mount clemens vs Riverbank provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mount clemens Riverbank
Black 24 1
White 65 13
Asian Data is updating 6
Hispanic 3 55
Two or More Races 8 23
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Mount clemens vs Riverbank

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mount clemens at 24% compared to 1% in Riverbank.
  • Mount clemens has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 13% in Riverbank.
  • In Riverbank, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Mount clemens.
  • Riverbank has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 55%, compared to 3% in Mount clemens.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Riverbank at 23%, compared to 8% in Mount clemens.
  • In Riverbank, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Mount clemens.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mount clemens Riverbank
Mental Health Not Good 19.9% 17.2%
Physical Health Not Good 14.1% 13.2%
Depression 25.8% 21.0%
Smoking 25.2% 15.0%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 16.4%
Obesity 42.7% 35.0%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mount clemens vs Riverbank

  • More residents in Mount clemens report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 17.2% in Riverbank.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mount clemens at 25.8% compared to 21.0% in Riverbank.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mount clemens at 25.2% compared to 15.0% in Riverbank.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Mount clemens at 16.9% compared to 16.4% in Riverbank.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mount clemens at 42.7% compared to 35.0% in Riverbank.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mount clemens at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverbank.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mount clemens Riverbank
No Schooling 1.4% (222) 3.1% (766)
High School Diploma 22.3% (3,437) 15.2% (3,764)
Less than High School 16.6% (2,554) 22.2% (5,505)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.1% (1,867) 11.3% (2,804)

Education Levels Comparison: Mount clemens vs Riverbank

  • In Riverbank, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.4% in Mount clemens.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount clemens hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 15.2% in Riverbank.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Riverbank at 22.2%, compared to 16.6% in Mount clemens.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount clemens hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 11.3% in Riverbank.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.