Demographics details for Mount clemens, MI vs Kennewick, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mount clemens, MI vs Kennewick, WA.

Data Mount clemens Kennewick
Population 15,409 84,750
Median Age 40.2 years 35.2 years
Median Income $55,154 $70,429
Married Families 30.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 12% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Mount clemens vs Kennewick

  • The population in Kennewick is higher at 84,750, compared to 15,409 in Mount clemens.
  • Residents in Mount clemens have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 35.2 years in Kennewick.
  • Kennewick has a higher median income of $70,429, compared to $55,154 in Mount clemens.
  • In Kennewick, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 30.0% in Mount clemens.
  • Mount clemens has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Kennewick.
  • Kennewick has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Mount clemens.

Demographics

Demographics Mount clemens vs Kennewick provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mount clemens Kennewick
Black 24 2
White 65 56
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 3 29
Two or More Races 8 10
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Mount clemens vs Kennewick

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mount clemens at 24% compared to 2% in Kennewick.
  • Mount clemens has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 56% in Kennewick.
  • In Kennewick, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Mount clemens.
  • Kennewick has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 3% in Mount clemens.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kennewick at 10%, compared to 8% in Mount clemens.
  • In Kennewick, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mount clemens.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mount clemens Kennewick
Mental Health Not Good 19.9% 17.7%
Physical Health Not Good 14.1% 12.5%
Depression 25.8% 26.4%
Smoking 25.2% 15.8%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 17.1%
Obesity 42.7% 34.1%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mount clemens vs Kennewick

  • More residents in Mount clemens report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 17.7% in Kennewick.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Kennewick at 26.4% versus 25.8% in Mount clemens.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mount clemens at 25.2% compared to 15.8% in Kennewick.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Kennewick at 17.1% compared to 16.9% in Mount clemens.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mount clemens at 42.7% compared to 34.1% in Kennewick.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kennewick at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Mount clemens.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mount clemens Kennewick
No Schooling 1.4% (222) 1.4% (1,168)
High School Diploma 22.3% (3,437) 13.2% (11,198)
Less than High School 16.6% (2,554) 15.4% (13,049)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.1% (1,867) 16.9% (14,348)

Education Levels Comparison: Mount clemens vs Kennewick

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Mount clemens and Kennewick at 1.4%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount clemens hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 13.2% in Kennewick.
  • More residents in Mount clemens have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 15.4% in Kennewick.
  • In Kennewick, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 12.1% in Mount clemens.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.