Demographics details for Mount clemens, MI vs Forest lake, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mount clemens, MI vs Forest lake, MN.

Data Mount clemens Forest lake
Population 15,409 20,857
Median Age 40.2 years 37.9 years
Median Income $55,154 $91,157
Married Families 30.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 12% 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Mount clemens vs Forest lake

  • The population in Forest lake is higher at 20,857, compared to 15,409 in Mount clemens.
  • Residents in Mount clemens have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 37.9 years in Forest lake.
  • Forest lake has a higher median income of $91,157, compared to $55,154 in Mount clemens.
  • In Forest lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 30.0% in Mount clemens.
  • Mount clemens has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
  • The unemployment rate in Mount clemens is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Forest lake.

Demographics

Demographics Mount clemens vs Forest lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mount clemens Forest lake
Black 24 3
White 65 81
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic 3 6
Two or More Races 8 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Mount clemens vs Forest lake

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mount clemens at 24% compared to 3% in Forest lake.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Forest lake at 81% compared to 65% in Mount clemens.
  • In Forest lake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Mount clemens.
  • Forest lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Mount clemens.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Mount clemens at 8% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mount clemens and Forest lake at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mount clemens Forest lake
Mental Health Not Good 19.9% 14.7%
Physical Health Not Good 14.1% 8.8%
Depression 25.8% 24.1%
Smoking 25.2% 15.7%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 21.4%
Obesity 42.7% 32.9%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mount clemens vs Forest lake

  • More residents in Mount clemens report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 14.7% in Forest lake.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mount clemens at 25.8% compared to 24.1% in Forest lake.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mount clemens at 25.2% compared to 15.7% in Forest lake.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Forest lake at 21.4% compared to 16.9% in Mount clemens.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mount clemens at 42.7% compared to 32.9% in Forest lake.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mount clemens at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Forest lake.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mount clemens Forest lake
No Schooling 1.4% (222) 0.5% (101)
High School Diploma 22.3% (3,437) 14.6% (3,055)
Less than High School 16.6% (2,554) 7.7% (1,615)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.1% (1,867) 24.6% (5,123)

Education Levels Comparison: Mount clemens vs Forest lake

  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount clemens have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Forest lake.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount clemens hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 14.6% in Forest lake.
  • More residents in Mount clemens have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 7.7% in Forest lake.
  • In Forest lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.6% compared to 12.1% in Mount clemens.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.