Demographics details for Mount clemens, MI vs Burbank, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mount clemens, MI vs Burbank, WA.
Data | Mount clemens | Burbank |
---|---|---|
Population | 15,409 | 3,383 |
Median Age | 40.2 years | 32.0 years |
Median Income | $55,154 | $84,046 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mount clemens vs Burbank
- In Mount clemens, the population is higher at 15,409, compared to 3,383 in Burbank.
- Residents in Mount clemens have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 32.0 years in Burbank.
- Burbank has a higher median income of $84,046, compared to $55,154 in Mount clemens.
- In Burbank, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 30.0% in Mount clemens.
- Mount clemens has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Burbank.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Mount clemens and Burbank at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Mount clemens vs Burbank provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mount clemens | Burbank |
---|---|---|
Black | 24 | 2 |
White | 65 | 63 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mount clemens vs Burbank
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mount clemens at 24% compared to 2% in Burbank.
- Mount clemens has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 63% in Burbank.
- Both Mount clemens and Burbank have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Burbank has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 3% in Mount clemens.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Burbank at 12%, compared to 8% in Mount clemens.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mount clemens and Burbank at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mount clemens | Burbank |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 13.3% |
Depression | 25.8% | 28.5% |
Smoking | 25.2% | 18.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 42.7% | 34.9% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mount clemens vs Burbank
- More residents in Mount clemens report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 19.3% in Burbank.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Burbank at 28.5% versus 25.8% in Mount clemens.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mount clemens at 25.2% compared to 18.1% in Burbank.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Burbank at 17.2% compared to 16.9% in Mount clemens.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mount clemens at 42.7% compared to 34.9% in Burbank.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mount clemens at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Burbank.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mount clemens | Burbank |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (222) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 22.3% (3,437) | 21.5% (727) |
Less than High School | 16.6% (2,554) | 8.4% (284) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (1,867) | 12.2% (412) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mount clemens vs Burbank
- A higher percentage of residents in Mount clemens have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Burbank.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mount clemens hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 21.5% in Burbank.
- More residents in Mount clemens have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 8.4% in Burbank.
- In Burbank, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 12.1% in Mount clemens.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.