Demographics details for Moundville, AL vs Sitka, AK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moundville, AL vs Sitka, AK.
| Data | Moundville | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,271 | 8,382 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $64,643 | $95,261 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Moundville vs Sitka
- The population in Sitka is higher at 8,382, compared to 3,271 in Moundville.
- The median age in Sitka is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 37.1 years in Moundville.
- Sitka has a higher median income of $95,261, compared to $64,643 in Moundville.
- In Sitka, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 33.0% in Moundville.
- Moundville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Sitka.
- Sitka has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 2.5% in Moundville.
Demographics
Demographics Moundville vs Sitka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Moundville | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 50 | 1 |
| White | 36 | 57 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 8 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 9 |
Demographics Comparison: Moundville vs Sitka
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Moundville at 50% compared to 1% in Sitka.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sitka at 57% compared to 36% in Moundville.
- In Sitka, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Moundville.
- Sitka has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Moundville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sitka at 18%, compared to 12% in Moundville.
- In Sitka, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 9%, compared to 0% in Moundville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Moundville | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 18.7% |
| Smoking | 20.3% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 42.9% | 31.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moundville vs Sitka
- More residents in Moundville report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 14.6% in Sitka.
- Depression is more prevalent in Moundville at 22.9% compared to 18.7% in Sitka.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Moundville at 20.3% compared to 16.4% in Sitka.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sitka at 19.3% compared to 14.4% in Moundville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Moundville at 42.9% compared to 31.7% in Sitka.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Moundville and Sitka at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Moundville | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (6) | 0.4% (33) |
| High School Diploma | 21.3% (698) | 16.7% (1,396) |
| Less than High School | 14.4% (470) | 5.8% (486) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (341) | 24.8% (2,076) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moundville vs Sitka
- In Sitka, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Moundville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moundville hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 16.7% in Sitka.
- More residents in Moundville have less than a high school education at 14.4% compared to 5.8% in Sitka.
- In Sitka, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 10.4% in Moundville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.