Demographics details for Moulton, TX vs Ephrata, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moulton, TX vs Ephrata, WA.
| Data | Moulton | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 856 | 8,476 |
| Median Age | 42.2 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $55,045 | $57,958 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Moulton vs Ephrata
- The population in Ephrata is higher at 8,476, compared to 856 in Moulton.
- Residents in Moulton have a higher median age of 42.2 years compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher median income of $57,958, compared to $55,045 in Moulton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Moulton at 38.0% compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- Moulton has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- The unemployment rate in Moulton is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Ephrata.
Demographics
Demographics Moulton vs Ephrata provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Moulton | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 64 | 63 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 24 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Moulton vs Ephrata
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Moulton at 3% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
- Moulton has a higher percentage of White residents at 64% compared to 63% in Ephrata.
- Both Moulton and Ephrata have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Ephrata has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 24% in Moulton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ephrata at 11%, compared to 9% in Moulton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Moulton and Ephrata at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Moulton | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | 35.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moulton vs Ephrata
- In Ephrata, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.3% in Moulton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ephrata at 27.0% versus 24.0% in Moulton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Moulton at 17.2% compared to 17.0% in Ephrata.
- Binge drinking is more common in Moulton at 19.4% compared to 17.6% in Ephrata.
- Obesity rates are higher in Moulton at 35.6% compared to 35.1% in Ephrata.
- Disability percentages are higher in Moulton at 15.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Moulton | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (1) | 0.8% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 25.7% (220) | 17.7% (1,503) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (117) | 14.4% (1,223) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (105) | 8.0% (677) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moulton vs Ephrata
- In Ephrata, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.1% in Moulton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moulton hold a high school diploma at 25.7% compared to 17.7% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ephrata at 14.4%, compared to 13.7% in Moulton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moulton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.