Demographics details for Moscow, ID vs Randleman, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moscow, ID vs Randleman, NC.
| Data | Moscow | Randleman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,249 | 4,642 |
| Median Age | 24.8 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $53,679 | $63,040 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Moscow vs Randleman
- In Moscow, the population is higher at 26,249, compared to 4,642 in Randleman.
- The median age in Randleman is higher at 33.5 years, compared to 24.8 years in Moscow.
- Randleman has a higher median income of $63,040, compared to $53,679 in Moscow.
- In Randleman, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 28.0% in Moscow.
- Moscow has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Randleman.
- The unemployment rate in Moscow is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Randleman.
Demographics
Demographics Moscow vs Randleman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Moscow | Randleman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 4 |
| White | 83 | 77 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Moscow vs Randleman
- In Randleman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Moscow.
- Moscow has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 77% in Randleman.
- The Asian population is larger in Moscow at 3% compared to 0% in Randleman.
- Randleman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 5% in Moscow.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Randleman at 8%, compared to 6% in Moscow.
- In Randleman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Moscow.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Moscow | Randleman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 13.6% | 19.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 31.2% | 37.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moscow vs Randleman
- In Randleman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.4% in Moscow.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Randleman at 25.7% versus 24.5% in Moscow.
- Randleman has a higher smoking rate at 19.4% compared to 13.6% in Moscow.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Randleman at 17.7% compared to 17.1% in Moscow.
- Randleman has higher obesity rates at 37.5% compared to 31.2% in Moscow.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Randleman at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Moscow.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Moscow | Randleman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (80) | 0.3% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 5.7% (1,492) | 16.5% (768) |
| Less than High School | 2.0% (515) | 22.1% (1,026) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.8% (6,776) | 6.9% (320) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moscow vs Randleman
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Moscow and Randleman at 0.3%.
- In Randleman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.5% compared to 5.7% in Moscow.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Randleman at 22.1%, compared to 2.0% in Moscow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moscow hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.8% compared to 6.9% in Randleman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.