Demographics details for Moscow, ID vs Parsons, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moscow, ID vs Parsons, KS.
| Data | Moscow | Parsons |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,249 | 9,382 |
| Median Age | 24.8 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $53,679 | $48,990 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Moscow vs Parsons
- In Moscow, the population is higher at 26,249, compared to 9,382 in Parsons.
- The median age in Parsons is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 24.8 years in Moscow.
- Moscow has a higher median income of $53,679 compared to $48,990 in Parsons.
- In Parsons, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 28.0% in Moscow.
- Moscow has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Parsons.
- The unemployment rate in Moscow is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Parsons.
Demographics
Demographics Moscow vs Parsons provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Moscow | Parsons |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 8 |
| White | 83 | 79 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Moscow vs Parsons
- In Parsons, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 2% in Moscow.
- Moscow has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 79% in Parsons.
- The Asian population is larger in Moscow at 3% compared to 0% in Parsons.
- Parsons has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Moscow.
- Both Moscow and Parsons have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Moscow at 1% compared to 0% in Parsons.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Moscow | Parsons |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 13.6% | 22.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 31.2% | 45.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moscow vs Parsons
- In Parsons, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.4% in Moscow.
- Depression is more prevalent in Moscow at 24.5% compared to 22.3% in Parsons.
- Parsons has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 13.6% in Moscow.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Parsons at 17.3% compared to 17.1% in Moscow.
- Parsons has higher obesity rates at 45.2% compared to 31.2% in Moscow.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Parsons at 23.0% compared to 10.0% in Moscow.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Moscow | Parsons |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (80) | 1.2% (113) |
| High School Diploma | 5.7% (1,492) | 15.2% (1,423) |
| Less than High School | 2.0% (515) | 11.6% (1,093) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.8% (6,776) | 17.3% (1,621) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moscow vs Parsons
- In Parsons, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Moscow.
- In Parsons, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.2% compared to 5.7% in Moscow.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Parsons at 11.6%, compared to 2.0% in Moscow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moscow hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.8% compared to 17.3% in Parsons.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.