Demographics details for Moscow, ID vs Hickory, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moscow, ID vs Hickory, NC.
Data | Moscow | Hickory |
---|---|---|
Population | 26,249 | 44,084 |
Median Age | 24.8 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $53,679 | $58,251 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Moscow vs Hickory
- The population in Hickory is higher at 44,084, compared to 26,249 in Moscow.
- The median age in Hickory is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 24.8 years in Moscow.
- Hickory has a higher median income of $58,251, compared to $53,679 in Moscow.
- In Hickory, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 28.0% in Moscow.
- Moscow has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Hickory.
- Hickory has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 4.2% in Moscow.
Demographics
Demographics Moscow vs Hickory provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Moscow | Hickory |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 13 |
White | 83 | 62 |
Asian | 3 | 4 |
Hispanic | 5 | 13 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Moscow vs Hickory
- In Hickory, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 2% in Moscow.
- Moscow has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 62% in Hickory.
- In Hickory, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Moscow.
- Hickory has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 5% in Moscow.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hickory at 7%, compared to 6% in Moscow.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Moscow and Hickory at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Moscow | Hickory |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 12.3% |
Depression | 24.5% | 24.8% |
Smoking | 13.6% | 18.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 31.2% | 37.7% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moscow vs Hickory
- In Hickory, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.4% in Moscow.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hickory at 24.8% versus 24.5% in Moscow.
- Hickory has a higher smoking rate at 18.1% compared to 13.6% in Moscow.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hickory at 17.2% compared to 17.1% in Moscow.
- Hickory has higher obesity rates at 37.7% compared to 31.2% in Moscow.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hickory at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Moscow.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Moscow | Hickory |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (80) | 0.7% (306) |
High School Diploma | 5.7% (1,492) | 13.1% (5,797) |
Less than High School | 2.0% (515) | 11.4% (5,022) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.8% (6,776) | 24.0% (10,580) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moscow vs Hickory
- In Hickory, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Moscow.
- In Hickory, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.1% compared to 5.7% in Moscow.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hickory at 11.4%, compared to 2.0% in Moscow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moscow hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.8% compared to 24.0% in Hickory.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.