Demographics details for Moscow, ID vs Andover, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moscow, ID vs Andover, CT.
| Data | Moscow | Andover |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,249 | 3,231 |
| Median Age | 24.8 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $53,679 | $98,000 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 70.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Moscow vs Andover
- In Moscow, the population is higher at 26,249, compared to 3,231 in Andover.
- The median age in Andover is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 24.8 years in Moscow.
- Andover has a higher median income of $98,000, compared to $53,679 in Moscow.
- In Andover, the percentage of married families is higher at 70.0%, compared to 28.0% in Moscow.
- Moscow has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Andover.
- The unemployment rate in Moscow is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.2% in Andover.
Demographics
Demographics Moscow vs Andover provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Moscow | Andover |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 83 | 95 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Moscow vs Andover
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Moscow at 2% compared to 1% in Andover.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Andover at 95% compared to 83% in Moscow.
- The Asian population is larger in Moscow at 3% compared to 2% in Andover.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Moscow at 5% compared to 1% in Andover.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Moscow at 6% compared to 1% in Andover.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Moscow at 1% compared to 0% in Andover.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Moscow | Andover |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.5% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 13.6% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 31.2% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moscow vs Andover
- More residents in Moscow report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Andover.
- Depression is more prevalent in Moscow at 24.5% compared to 0.0% in Andover.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Moscow at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Andover.
- Binge drinking is more common in Moscow at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Andover.
- Obesity rates are higher in Moscow at 31.2% compared to 0.0% in Andover.
- Disability percentages are higher in Moscow at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Andover.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Moscow | Andover |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (80) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 5.7% (1,492) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 2.0% (515) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.8% (6,776) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moscow vs Andover
- A higher percentage of residents in Moscow have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Andover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moscow hold a high school diploma at 5.7% compared to 0.0% in Andover.
- More residents in Moscow have less than a high school education at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Andover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moscow hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.8% compared to 0.0% in Andover.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.