Demographics details for Morristown, OH vs Beaver dam, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Morristown, OH vs Beaver dam, WI.

Data Morristown Beaver dam
Population 246 16,582
Median Age 41.6 years 40.4 years
Median Income $48,125 $65,802
Married Families 43.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 10% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.1

Population Comparison: Morristown vs Beaver dam

  • The population in Beaver dam is higher at 16,582, compared to 246 in Morristown.
  • Residents in Morristown have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 40.4 years in Beaver dam.
  • Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802, compared to $48,125 in Morristown.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Morristown at 43.0% compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
  • Morristown has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
  • The unemployment rate in Morristown is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.

Demographics

Demographics Morristown vs Beaver dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Morristown Beaver dam
Black Data is updating 3
White 100 81
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic Data is updating 8
Two or More Races Data is updating 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Morristown vs Beaver dam

  • In Beaver dam, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Morristown.
  • Morristown has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 81% in Beaver dam.
  • In Beaver dam, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Morristown.
  • Beaver dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Morristown.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beaver dam at 6%, compared to 0% in Morristown.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Morristown and Beaver dam at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Morristown Beaver dam
Mental Health Not Good 17.9% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 10.6%
Depression 24.9% 23.6%
Smoking 21.6% 17.6%
Binge Drinking 18.1% 23.5%
Obesity 37.8% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Morristown vs Beaver dam

  • More residents in Morristown report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Morristown at 24.9% compared to 23.6% in Beaver dam.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Morristown at 21.6% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 18.1% in Morristown.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Morristown at 37.8% compared to 36.6% in Beaver dam.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Morristown at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaver dam.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Morristown Beaver dam
No Schooling 1.6% (4) 0.3% (47)
High School Diploma 29.3% (72) 23.8% (3,947)
Less than High School 22.0% (54) 10.3% (1,706)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.6% (31) 18.2% (3,023)

Education Levels Comparison: Morristown vs Beaver dam

  • A higher percentage of residents in Morristown have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Morristown hold a high school diploma at 29.3% compared to 23.8% in Beaver dam.
  • More residents in Morristown have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 10.3% in Beaver dam.
  • In Beaver dam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 12.6% in Morristown.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.