Demographics details for Moreno valley, CA vs Woodstock, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moreno valley, CA vs Woodstock, VA.
Data | Moreno valley | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Population | 211,924 | 5,907 |
Median Age | 31.8 years | 38.4 years |
Median Income | $82,637 | $64,470 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Moreno valley vs Woodstock
- In Moreno valley, the population is higher at 211,924, compared to 5,907 in Woodstock.
- The median age in Woodstock is higher at 38.4 years, compared to 31.8 years in Moreno valley.
- Moreno valley has a higher median income of $82,637 compared to $64,470 in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Moreno valley at 34.0% compared to 32.0% in Woodstock.
- Moreno valley has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 10% in Woodstock.
- The unemployment rate in Moreno valley is higher at 5.6%, compared to 2.5% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Moreno valley vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Moreno valley | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 6 |
White | 6 | 60 |
Asian | 5 | 4 |
Hispanic | 60 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Moreno valley vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Moreno valley at 17% compared to 6% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodstock at 60% compared to 6% in Moreno valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Moreno valley at 5% compared to 4% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Moreno valley at 60% compared to 19% in Woodstock.
- Both Moreno valley and Woodstock have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Moreno valley at 1% compared to 0% in Woodstock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Moreno valley | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 12.3% |
Depression | 16.6% | 24.9% |
Smoking | 14.0% | 18.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 38.2% | 38.9% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moreno valley vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.4% in Moreno valley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodstock at 24.9% versus 16.6% in Moreno valley.
- Woodstock has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 14.0% in Moreno valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodstock at 16.2% compared to 15.3% in Moreno valley.
- Woodstock has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 38.2% in Moreno valley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodstock at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Moreno valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Moreno valley | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (4,503) | 2.0% (118) |
High School Diploma | 16.2% (34,348) | 19.0% (1,121) |
Less than High School | 23.9% (50,595) | 17.2% (1,018) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (22,123) | 16.4% (968) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moreno valley vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of residents in Moreno valley have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 2.0% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 16.2% in Moreno valley.
- More residents in Moreno valley have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 17.2% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 10.4% in Moreno valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.