Demographics details for Moreno valley, CA vs Hobart, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moreno valley, CA vs Hobart, IN.
| Data | Moreno valley | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 211,924 | 29,458 |
| Median Age | 31.8 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $82,637 | $69,398 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Moreno valley vs Hobart
- In Moreno valley, the population is higher at 211,924, compared to 29,458 in Hobart.
- The median age in Hobart is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 31.8 years in Moreno valley.
- Moreno valley has a higher median income of $82,637 compared to $69,398 in Hobart.
- In Hobart, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 34.0% in Moreno valley.
- Moreno valley has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 8% in Hobart.
- The unemployment rate in Moreno valley is higher at 5.6%, compared to 5.3% in Hobart.
Demographics
Demographics Moreno valley vs Hobart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Moreno valley | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 11 |
| White | 6 | 63 |
| Asian | 5 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 60 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Moreno valley vs Hobart
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Moreno valley at 17% compared to 11% in Hobart.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hobart at 63% compared to 6% in Moreno valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Moreno valley at 5% compared to 2% in Hobart.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Moreno valley at 60% compared to 17% in Hobart.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Moreno valley at 11% compared to 7% in Hobart.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Moreno valley at 1% compared to 0% in Hobart.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Moreno valley | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 16.6% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 14.0% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 38.2% | 38.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moreno valley vs Hobart
- In Hobart, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.4% in Moreno valley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hobart at 24.5% versus 16.6% in Moreno valley.
- Hobart has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 14.0% in Moreno valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hobart at 18.9% compared to 15.3% in Moreno valley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Moreno valley at 38.2% compared to 38.1% in Hobart.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hobart at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Moreno valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Moreno valley | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (4,503) | 0.7% (217) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (34,348) | 24.5% (7,227) |
| Less than High School | 23.9% (50,595) | 8.2% (2,428) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (22,123) | 16.3% (4,813) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moreno valley vs Hobart
- A higher percentage of residents in Moreno valley have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.7% in Hobart.
- In Hobart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 16.2% in Moreno valley.
- More residents in Moreno valley have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 8.2% in Hobart.
- In Hobart, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 10.4% in Moreno valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.