Demographics details for Moreno valley, CA vs Federal way, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Moreno valley, CA vs Federal way, WA.

Data Moreno valley Federal way
Population 211,924 97,863
Median Age 31.8 years 37.4 years
Median Income $82,637 $80,360
Married Families 34.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 16% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.6 5.7

Population Comparison: Moreno valley vs Federal way

  • In Moreno valley, the population is higher at 211,924, compared to 97,863 in Federal way.
  • The median age in Federal way is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 31.8 years in Moreno valley.
  • Moreno valley has a higher median income of $82,637 compared to $80,360 in Federal way.
  • In Federal way, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 34.0% in Moreno valley.
  • Moreno valley has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 9% in Federal way.
  • Federal way has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 5.6% in Moreno valley.

Demographics

Demographics Moreno valley vs Federal way provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Moreno valley Federal way
Black 17 17
White 6 34
Asian 5 15
Hispanic 60 19
Two or More Races 11 14
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Moreno valley vs Federal way

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Moreno valley and Federal way at 17%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Federal way at 34% compared to 6% in Moreno valley.
  • In Federal way, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 5% in Moreno valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Moreno valley at 60% compared to 19% in Federal way.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Federal way at 14%, compared to 11% in Moreno valley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Moreno valley and Federal way at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Moreno valley Federal way
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% 17.5%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% 10.9%
Depression 16.6% 24.7%
Smoking 14.0% 12.7%
Binge Drinking 15.3% 16.5%
Obesity 38.2% 27.2%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Moreno valley vs Federal way

  • In Federal way, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.4% in Moreno valley.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Federal way at 24.7% versus 16.6% in Moreno valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Moreno valley at 14.0% compared to 12.7% in Federal way.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Federal way at 16.5% compared to 15.3% in Moreno valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Moreno valley at 38.2% compared to 27.2% in Federal way.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Federal way at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Moreno valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Moreno valley Federal way
No Schooling 2.1% (4,503) 1.8% (1,735)
High School Diploma 16.2% (34,348) 15.3% (15,003)
Less than High School 23.9% (50,595) 11.0% (10,805)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.4% (22,123) 21.2% (20,761)

Education Levels Comparison: Moreno valley vs Federal way

  • A higher percentage of residents in Moreno valley have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.8% in Federal way.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Moreno valley hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 15.3% in Federal way.
  • More residents in Moreno valley have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 11.0% in Federal way.
  • In Federal way, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 10.4% in Moreno valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.