Demographics details for Moreno valley, CA vs Cleburne, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moreno valley, CA vs Cleburne, TX.
| Data | Moreno valley | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 211,924 | 33,826 |
| Median Age | 31.8 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $82,637 | $60,929 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Moreno valley vs Cleburne
- In Moreno valley, the population is higher at 211,924, compared to 33,826 in Cleburne.
- The median age in Cleburne is higher at 35.2 years, compared to 31.8 years in Moreno valley.
- Moreno valley has a higher median income of $82,637 compared to $60,929 in Cleburne.
- In Cleburne, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 34.0% in Moreno valley.
- Moreno valley has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 11% in Cleburne.
- The unemployment rate in Moreno valley is higher at 5.6%, compared to 3.9% in Cleburne.
Demographics
Demographics Moreno valley vs Cleburne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Moreno valley | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 6 |
| White | 6 | 52 |
| Asian | 5 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 60 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Moreno valley vs Cleburne
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Moreno valley at 17% compared to 6% in Cleburne.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cleburne at 52% compared to 6% in Moreno valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Moreno valley at 5% compared to 1% in Cleburne.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Moreno valley at 60% compared to 29% in Cleburne.
- Both Moreno valley and Cleburne have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Moreno valley and Cleburne at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Moreno valley | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 16.6% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 14.0% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 38.2% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moreno valley vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.4% in Moreno valley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cleburne at 23.6% versus 16.6% in Moreno valley.
- Cleburne has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Moreno valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cleburne at 17.9% compared to 15.3% in Moreno valley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Moreno valley at 38.2% compared to 37.6% in Cleburne.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cleburne at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Moreno valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Moreno valley | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (4,503) | 1.4% (471) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (34,348) | 17.8% (6,005) |
| Less than High School | 23.9% (50,595) | 17.8% (6,010) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (22,123) | 10.0% (3,384) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moreno valley vs Cleburne
- A higher percentage of residents in Moreno valley have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.4% in Cleburne.
- In Cleburne, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 16.2% in Moreno valley.
- More residents in Moreno valley have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 17.8% in Cleburne.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moreno valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.4% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.