Demographics details for Moorpark, CA vs Swainsboro, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Moorpark, CA vs Swainsboro, GA.
| Data | Moorpark | Swainsboro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,514 | 7,583 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 30.1 years |
| Median Income | $143,218 | $44,491 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 24% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Moorpark vs Swainsboro
- In Moorpark, the population is higher at 35,514, compared to 7,583 in Swainsboro.
- Residents in Moorpark have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 30.1 years in Swainsboro.
- Moorpark has a higher median income of $143,218 compared to $44,491 in Swainsboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Moorpark at 47.0% compared to 25.0% in Swainsboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Swainsboro at 24%, compared to 8% in Moorpark.
- Swainsboro has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.1% in Moorpark.
Demographics
Demographics Moorpark vs Swainsboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Moorpark | Swainsboro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 57 |
| White | 38 | 33 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 34 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Moorpark vs Swainsboro
- In Swainsboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 57% compared to 3% in Moorpark.
- Moorpark has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 33% in Swainsboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Moorpark at 7% compared to 0% in Swainsboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Moorpark at 34% compared to 4% in Swainsboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Moorpark at 17% compared to 6% in Swainsboro.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Moorpark at 1% compared to 0% in Swainsboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Moorpark | Swainsboro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 17.6% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 9.2% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 24.7% | 42.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Moorpark vs Swainsboro
- In Swainsboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 13.8% in Moorpark.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Swainsboro at 20.6% versus 17.6% in Moorpark.
- Swainsboro has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 9.2% in Moorpark.
- Binge drinking is more common in Moorpark at 17.8% compared to 13.6% in Swainsboro.
- Swainsboro has higher obesity rates at 42.6% compared to 24.7% in Moorpark.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Swainsboro at 24.0% compared to 10.0% in Moorpark.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Moorpark | Swainsboro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (300) | 1.9% (147) |
| High School Diploma | 9.3% (3,304) | 16.7% (1,264) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (4,201) | 11.6% (879) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (10,699) | 6.6% (500) |
Education Levels Comparison: Moorpark vs Swainsboro
- In Swainsboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.8% in Moorpark.
- In Swainsboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 9.3% in Moorpark.
- More residents in Moorpark have less than a high school education at 11.8% compared to 11.6% in Swainsboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Moorpark hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 6.6% in Swainsboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.